Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) versus medial UKA in treating unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods: We systematically searched Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to September 2024. Literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Review Manager 5.4 software was used to analyze postoperative functional scores, pain scores, aseptic loosening, progression of contralateral arthritis, and prosthesis survival.

Results: Fifteen cohort studies, encompassing 2,592 knees with medial UKA and 614 knees with lateral UKA, were included. The analysis showed no statistically significant differences in functional scores [SMD = 0.11, 95% CI (- 0.10, 0.33), I = 64%, P = 0.31], pain scores [SMD = 0.23, 95% CI: (- 0.22, 0.67), I = 91%, P = 0.32], aseptic loosening [OR = 1.33, 95% CI: (0.31, 5.78), I = 0%, P = 0.70], progression of contralateral arthritis [OR = 0.37, 95% CI: (0.07, 1.91), I = 0%, P = 0.23], short- to intermediate-term survival [OR = 1.40, 95% CI: (0.84, 2.35), I = 0%, P = 0.20], and long-term survival [OR = 1.12, 95% CI: (0.61, 2.05), I = 0%, P = 0.70].

Conclusion: Our findings indicate no significant differences in functional outcomes, pain relief, aseptic loosening, progression of contralateral arthritis, or prosthesis survival between lateral and medial UKA. Thus, both approaches are reliable options for patients with unicompartmental KOA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699812PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05404-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medial uka
12
aseptic loosening
12
progression contralateral
12
contralateral arthritis
12
efficacy lateral
8
versus medial
8
functional scores
8
pain scores
8
loosening progression
8
arthritis prosthesis
8

Similar Publications

Background: An overhang of the tibial baseplate in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been associated with postoperative pain and impaired function.

Hypothesis: There are significant patient factors that influence the insertion of a size 1 minimum-sized tibial baseplate in fixed-bearing (FB) UKA for Japanese patients with varus knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Purpose: This study investigated the above-hypothesized factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose:  Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a rare surgical procedure for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). This study compares patient demographics, long-term survival rates, revision risks, and causes of revision in PFA with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: Data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) (1994-2022) included 725 PFA, 102,135 TKA, and 14,315 UKA procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Aseptic loosening remains a leading cause of revision in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This imaging study aimed to identify recurrent patterns of coronal alignment deviation in patients undergoing revision to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to explore whether subtle malalignment may contribute to biomechanical failure.

Methods: Imaging of patients who underwent revision surgery of a medial UKA to TKA for aseptic loosening of the tibial or femoral component was retrieved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), encompassing both medial and lateral approaches, facilitates accelerated rehabilitation and enhances patient satisfaction in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal surgical techniques and implant positioning continue to be topics of ongoing debate. This study compares the clinical efficacy and implant survival rates of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to inform clinical decision-making and optimize patient outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative extra-articular proximal tibial varus deformities on preoperative and postoperative subjective outcomes in patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: A prospective study was performed among 104 patients undergoing robotic-arm assisted fixed-bearing medial UKA for isolated anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis. Patients were categorized based on their preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), stratifying them into patients with tibial varus (MPTA <85°) and those without (MPTA ≥85°).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF