A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Guidance Documents for Off-Label Drug Use Management for Chinese Health Care Institutions: A Scoping Review. | LitMetric

Guidance Documents for Off-Label Drug Use Management for Chinese Health Care Institutions: A Scoping Review.

J Evid Based Med

Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.

Published: December 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Off-label drug use (OLDU) is a common practice in health care institutions, and numerous guidance documents have been developed to guide the management of OLDU in China. This scoping review aims to compare these documents and identify existing issues.

Methods: PubMed, EMbase, three Chinese databases, the National Public Service Platform for Standards Information and the official websites of pharmaceutical-related associations were searched to identify guidance documents relevant to the management of OLDU for Chinese health care institutions. We extracted and compared the recommended practices for various aspects of OLDU management, including management systems, organizational structure, prerequisites for OLDU, approval processes, evidence-based evaluation, informed consent, and other related aspects.

Results: A total of 16 guidance documents were included, comprising 12 expert consensuses, 2 practice guidelines, and 2 group standards. Only six documents provide specific requirements for the establishment of management systems. Management of OLDU requires involvement from multiple departments or committees, yet only a few documents explicitly delineate the supervisory authority, and the responsibilities of the parties involved. These documents also show significant disparities in their approval process, evidence-based evaluation, and informed consent recommendations. Furthermore, only a minority of the documents provide specific requirements for training and assessments focused on OLDU and improving adverse reaction monitoring.

Conclusion: These guidance documents differ significantly in their specific recommendations for the management of OLDU and lack sufficient emphasis on certain critical aspects. It may be beneficial for health administrative authorities to promote the development of unified national guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12669DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

guidance documents
20
management oldu
16
health care
12
care institutions
12
documents
9
off-label drug
8
management
8
chinese health
8
scoping review
8
oldu
8

Similar Publications