Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08624-9 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of R.U. Din, et al. concerning "Efficacy of two opportunistic methods for screening osteoporosis in lumbar spine surgery patients" by T.-T. Xu, et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07938-4).
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, P. R. China.
Answer to the letter to the editor of K. Zhang, et al. concerning "Impact of coexisting lumbar spinal stenosis and sleep disorders on fall risk: a cross-sectional study of community-dwelling residents (locomotive syndrome and health outcome in Aizu cohort study)" by H. Kobayashi et al. (Eur Spine J [2025]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09208-x).
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 960-1295, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima City, Japan.
Answer to the letter to the editor of T.T. Aduri, et al. concerning "CALM1 polymorphism in degenerative cervical myelopathy of the Indian cohort" by Maheshwari S, et al. (Eur spine J [2025]; doi:10.1007/s00586-025-09090-7).
Eur Spine J
September 2025
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Re: How reliable are ChatGPT and Google's answers to frequently asked questions about unicondylar knee arthroplasty from a scientific perspective?
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
August 2025
Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
I have been scammed in my qualitative research.
Res Integr Peer Rev
August 2025
Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
We have been scammed in our online qualitative study by some fraudulent participants who falsely claimed to be pharmacists or community health workers. These participants were interviewed before we discovered that they were not who they claimed to be.In this commentary, we describe key indicators of potential imposters, such as the number of emails received in a short period of time, emails with similar content and address structure, participants having a keen interest in the reimbursement, camera switched off during the interview, and inconsistency in the participants' responses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF