98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To build and validate a periprostatic fat magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based radiomics nomogram for prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) receiving radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 356 patients with non-metastatic PCa who underwent preoperative mpMRI followed by RP treatment at our institution. Radiomic features were extracted from both intratumoral region and the periprostatic fat region, which were segmented on images obtained through T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent-diffusion coefficient (ADC) imaging. Three radiomics models were developed by applying the Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, followed by Cox risk regression to construct a combined radiomics-clinical model by integrating the optimal radiomics score and clinicopathological risk factors to draw a nomogram. The predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier analysis and calibration curves.
Results: One hundred and twenty-one patients (33.98%) experienced biochemical recurrence. ROC analyses showed that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the periprostatic fat-intratumoral radiomics model demonstrated the highest AUC at 0.921 (95%CI, 0.857-0.981), 0.875 (95%CI, 0.763-0.950), 0.854 (95%CI, 0.706-0.923) for 1-year, 3-years and 5-years bRFS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Pathological T stage, ISUP grading group and Positive surgical margin were independent prognostic factors for predicting bRFS. A radiomics-clinical nomogram based on these clinical predictors and periprostatic fat-intratumoral radiomics score was constructed. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that radiomics-clinical nomogram was significantly related with survival of PCa (P < 0.001); and calibration curves revealed the predicted and observed survival probability of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year bRFS had high degree of consistency in the training and validation group. The radiomics-clinical nomogram showed a significant improvement than the clinical model for 1-year (AUC, 0.944; 95%CI, 0.912-0.990 vs. AUC, 0.839; 95%CI, 0.661-0.928; P = 0.009), 3-year (AUC, 0.864; 95%CI, 0.772-0.969 vs. AUC, 0.776; 95%CI, 0.602-0.872; P = 0.008), and 5-year bRFS (AUC, 0.907; 95%CI, 0.836-0.982 vs. AUC, 0.819; 95%CI, 0.687-0.915; P = 0.027).
Conclusions: This study developed and validated the radiomics-clinical nomogram for the prediction of bRFS in non-metastatic PCa patients underwent RP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600801 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13207-4 | DOI Listing |
Bioengineering (Basel)
July 2025
Department of Urology, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men, and emerging evidence proposed a potential role for periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) in tumor progression. However, its relationship with imaging-based risk stratification systems such as PI-RADS remains uncertain. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether periprostatic and subcutaneous fat thickness are associated with PI-RADS scores or PSA levels in biopsy-naïve patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Urol
August 2025
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.76 Linjiang Road,Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, China.
Background: To explore the efficacy of combining MRI-derived quantitative data on Periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) with clinical biomarkers, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA), to enhance the high-grade (PCa) screening.
Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we reviewed clinical and pathological records of patients who had undergone prostate MRI between January 2020 and January 2023. Two radiologists measured PPAT metrics - subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), periprostatic fat thickness (PPFT), periprostatic fat area (PPFA), and periprostatic fat volume (PPFV) - on T1-weighted axial images.
Nagoya J Med Sci
May 2025
Department of Radiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
We compared the qualitative and quantitative quality of prostate conventional T2-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging with deep-learning reconstruction. Patients with suspected prostate cancer undergoing magnetic resonance imaging between April 2022 and June 2023 were included. Quantitative analysis was performed to determine the signal-to-noise and contrast ratios of the perirectal fat tissue, internal obturator muscle, and pubic tubercle.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
September 2025
Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Background: We sought to characterize periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) featuring water-to-oil ratio (R) to detect brown adipocyte (BAT).
Patients And Methods: Between November 2021 and September 2023, 21 localized patients with prostate cancer were studied, categorized as low (n = 4), intermediate (n = 4), and high risk (n = 13). We utilized MRI to analyze the water-only signal and fat-only signal.