Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Electronic health record systems have made it possible for clinicians to use previously encountered similar cases to support clinical decision-making. However, most studies for similar case retrieval were based on single-modal data. The existing studies on cross-modal clinical case retrieval were limited. We aimed to develop a CRoss-Modal Retrieval (CRMR) model to retrieve similar clinical cases recorded in different data modalities.
Materials And Methods: The publically available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Chest X-ray (MIMIC-CXR) dataset was used for model development and testing. The CRMR model was designed as a modular model containing two feature extraction models, two feature transformation models, one feature transformation optimization model, and one case retrieval model. The ability to retrieve similar clinical cases recorded in different data modalities was facilitated by the use of contrastive deep learning and k-nearest neighbor search.
Results: The average retrieval precision, denoted as AP@k, of the developed CRMR model, were 76.9 %@5, 76.7 %@10, 76.5 %@20, 76.3 %@50, and 77.9 %@100, respectively. Here k is the number of similar cases returned after retrieval. The average retrieval time varied from 0.013 ms to 0.016 ms with k varying from 5 to 100. Moreover, the model can retrieve similar cases with the same multiple radiographic manifestations as the query case.
Discussion: The CRMR model has shown promising cross-modal retrieval performance in clinical case analysis, with the potential for future scalability and improvement in handling diverse disease types and data modalities. The CRMR model has promising potential to aid clinicians in making optimal and explainable clinical decisions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105680 | DOI Listing |