98%
921
2 minutes
20
To assess the burden of postdischarge health care utilization given by readmissions beyond 30 days following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) nationwide.Women with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and concurrent IBR (autologous and implant-based) were identified within the 2010 to 2019 Nationwide Readmission Database. Cox proportional hazards and generalized linear regression controlling for patient- and hospital-level confounders were used to determine factors associated with 180-day unplanned readmissions and incremental hospital costs, respectively.Within 180 days, 10.7% of 100,942 women were readmitted following IBR. Readmissions tended to be publicly insured (30.8 vs. 21.7%, < 0.001) and multimorbid (Elixhauser Comorbidity Index > 2 31.6 vs. 19.6%, < 0.001) compared with nonreadmitted patients. There were no differences in readmission rates among types of IBR (tissue expander 11.2%, implant 10.7%, autologous 10.8%; > 0.69). Of all readmissions, 40% occurred within 30 days and 21.7% in a different hospital and 40% required a major procedure in the operating room. Infection was the leading cause of readmissions (29.8%). In risk-adjusted analyses, patients with carcinoma in situ, publicly insured, low socioeconomic status, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with increased readmissions (all < 0.05). Readmissions resulted in additional $8,971.78 (95% confidence interval: $8,537.72-9,405.84, < 0.001) in hospital costs, which accounted for 15% of the total cost of IBR nationwide.The majority of inpatient health care utilization given by readmissions following mastectomy and IBR occurs beyond the 30-day benchmark. There is evidence of fragmentation of care as a quarter of readmissions occur in a different hospital and over one-third require major procedures. Mitigating postoperative infectious complications could result in the highest reduction of readmissions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2460-4821 | DOI Listing |
Obesity (Silver Spring)
September 2025
Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Objective: From October 18-20, 2022, the National Institutes of Health held a workshop to examine the state of the science concerning obesity interventions in adults to promote health equity. The workshop had three objectives: (1) Convene experts from key institutions and the community to identify gaps in knowledge and opportunities to address obesity, (2) generate recommendations for obesity prevention and treatment to achieve health equity, and (3) identify challenges and needs to address obesity prevalence and disparities, and develop a diverse workforce.
Methods: A three-day virtual convening.
Stroke
September 2025
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. (V.Y., B.C.V.C., L.C., L.O., M.W.P.).
Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion and target mismatch on perfusion computed tomography.
Methods: ETERNAL-LVO was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, phase 3, superiority trial where adult participants with a large vessel occlusion, presenting within 24 hours of onset with salvageable tissue on computed tomography perfusion, were randomized to tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or standard care across 11 primary and comprehensive stroke centers in Australia.
Dan Med J
August 2025
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University.
Introduction: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a well-established treatment for patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been investigated in several studies and national registries. However, the treatment has not been compared to non-surgical treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDan Med J
August 2025
Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark.
Introduction: In various countries, an increasing proportion of general practitioner (GP) referrals is returned by hospitals. We aimed to uncover the causes and consequences of referral returns from the perspective of GP liaisons.
Methods: Individual interviews with 20 GP liaison officers from various departments in Southern Denmark, serving 1.