Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion and target mismatch on perfusion computed tomography.
Methods: ETERNAL-LVO was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, phase 3, superiority trial where adult participants with a large vessel occlusion, presenting within 24 hours of onset with salvageable tissue on computed tomography perfusion, were randomized to tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or standard care across 11 primary and comprehensive stroke centers in Australia. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 or return to baseline at 90 days via a modified Poisson regression model. Secondary outcomes include the modified Rankin Scale, considered as an ordinal variable, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Results: Following trial initiation, a supply shortage of the investigational product hindered recruitment. When supply resumed, phase 3 evidence had emerged supporting tenecteplase use within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, including large vessel occlusion. ETERNAL-LVO was, therefore, terminated early. Two hundred forty-two participants (median age: 73 years, 43% female, 79% undergoing EVT) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis; 120 received tenecteplase and 122 received standard care. No difference in the primary outcome was observed between the tenecteplase (n=44, 37%) and standard care (n=52, 43%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.66-1.21]; =0.48). No significant differences in an ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale were observed between the 2 treatment groups. In a planned per-protocol analysis, the odds of improvement by 1 point in the modified Rankin Scale were doubled in the tenecteplase-treated transfer subgroup compared with standard care transfer patients (odds ratio, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.07-6.40]). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5 (4%) participants assigned to tenecteplase and was present in 1 (1%) participant assigned to standard care.
Conclusions: Treatment with tenecteplase did not increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, but early stoppage of the study prevents definitive conclusions from being drawn.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04454788.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052511 | DOI Listing |