Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for resectable NSCLC, yet the prognostic significance of pathologic response remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR) on event-free survival (EFS) and assessed the influence of adjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods: We performed an IPD meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials on neoadjuvant or perioperative anti-programmed death-ligand 1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The IPD was extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves for pCR and MPR from the included studies. Survival outcomes were compared between patients achieving pCR or MPR and those who did not, considering both intention-to-treat and resected populations.

Results: Achieving pCR or MPR was associated with improved EFS in the intention-to-treat population (pCR, hazard ratio = 0.13; MPR, hazard ratio = 0.18, respectively) with a 24 months EFS rate of 94% and 88% for patients who achieved pCR and MPR, respectively. Independently from pCR status, patients who were treated in an experimental arm that included adjuvant immunotherapy had similar EFS.

Conclusions: Our study reported a strong EFS improvement in patients who achieved either pCR or MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy after tumor resection was not associated with improved EFS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1443DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pcr mpr
20
pathologic response
12
resectable nsclc
12
neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy
12
event-free survival
8
major pathologic
8
patients resectable
8
chemoimmunotherapy adjuvant
8
systematic review
8
review individual
8

Similar Publications

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, as well as the 3-year survival outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy (NICT) plus surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in real-world settings.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent surgery after NICT in our hospital between May 2019 and Mar 2022, with a median follow-up of 37.6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Given that pathologists now frequently assess pathologic response following neoadjuvant or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC, we set up a multicentre study to evaluate the current practice of regression grading in Germany (Re-GraDE NSCLC).

Methods: 133 cases of NSCLC resection specimens following chemoimmunotherapy (IO) were collected from 9 high-volume lung cancer centres in Germany. Case characteristics were obtained from pathology reports/electronic medical records.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: From the 1960s and up until 2021, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has represented the standard of care for potentially resectable stage III (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, in recent years, immunotherapy in the form of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized oncology treatment strategies and several ICIs have been investigated for the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC, both in monotherapy and in combination with other ICIs or chemotherapy.

Areas Covered: Therefore, this paper aims to review the currently available data supporting the role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as to discuss the challenges associated with it.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus anti-programmed death (ligand)-1 (anti-PD-(L)1) inhibitors (chemoimmunotherapy) for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is under investigation, but differences in pathological response rates between patients who achieved objective responses after 2 versus 3-6 cycles remain unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 481 stage II-III NSCLC patients who had 2-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery (June 2018-February 2024). The primary outcomes compared the pathological response (pathological complete response [pCR] and major pathological response [MPR]) between the 2-cycle (n = 99) and 3-6-cycle (n = 382) groups in patients who achieved objective response as well as between objective response rate (ORR) and non-ORR groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NICT) in treating locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Materials And Methods: This retrospective analysis included 379 patients, who received NICT (PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy) before surgery at Shandong Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2025. Pathological responses were assessed using standardized criteria, including pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and tumor regression grade (TRG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF