Contact between leaked cement and adjacent vertebral endplate induces a greater risk of adjacent vertebral fracture with vertebral bone cement augmentation biomechanically.

Background Context: Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) is a frequently observed complication after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture (OVCF). Studies have demonstrated that intervertebral cement leakage (ICL) can increase the incidence of AVF, but others have reached opposite conclusions. The stress concentration initially increases the risk of AVF, and dispersive concentrated stress is the main biomechanical function of the intervertebral disc (IVD).

Purpose: This study was designed to validate the hypothesis that direct contact between the leaked cement and adjacent bony endplate (BEP) can inhibit this biomechanical function, trigger adjacent vertebral stress concentration and increase the risk of AVF.

Study Design: A retrospective study and corresponding numerical mechanical simulations.

Patient Sample: Clinical data from 97 OVCF patients treated by bone cement augmentation operations were reviewed in this study.

Outcome Measures: Clinical assessments involved measuring ICL and cement-BEP contact status in patients with and without AVF. Numerical simulations were conducted to compute stress values in adjacent vertebral body's BEP and cancellous bone under various body positions.

Materials And Methods: Radiographic and demographic data of 97 OVCF patients (with an average follow-up period of 11.5 months) treated using bone cement augmentation operation were reviewed in the present study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with AVF and those without AVF. Bone cement leakage status was judged via 2 different methods: with or without IVD cement leakage and with and without adjacent vertebral endplate contact. The data from patients with and without AVF were compared, and the independent risk factors were identified through regression analysis. Patients without IVD cement leakage, with IVD cement leakage but without adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact, and with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact were simulated using a previously constructed and validated lumbar finite element model, and the biomechanical indicators related to the AVF were computed and recorded in these surgical models.

Results: Radiographic analysis revealed that the incidence of AVF was numerically higher, but was not significantly higher in patients with IVD cement leakage. In contrast, patients with direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact had a significantly greater incidence of AVF, which has also been proven to be an independent risk factor for AVF. In addition, numerical mechanical simulations revealed an obvious stress concentration tendency (the higher maximum equivalent stress value) in the adjacent vertebral body in the model with endplate cement contact.

Conclusions: Direct adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact induces a greater risk of AVF through deterioration of the local biomechanical environment. Cement injection, therefore, should be terminated when IVD cement leakage occurs to reduce adjacent vertebral endplate cement contact and reduce the resulting risk of AVF biomechanics.