Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The clinical use of ultrasound has increased the chances of successful insertion of all venous access devices, including short peripheral cannulas (SPC) and long peripheral catheters (LPC). The aim of the study was to compare the clinical performance of peripheral cannulas inserted using the traditional "blind" technique versus those inserted with ultrasound guidance (US).

Methods: In this retrospective study we compared 135 peripheral intravenous cannulations (PIVCs) with ultrasound guidance and 135 PIVCs with blind technique, inserted in children (0-18 years) in the emergency department. All devices were inserted using the catheter-over-needle technique. With the blind technique, superficial arm veins were cannulated using SPCs (1.9 cm, 24G; 2.5 cm, 22G; 3.2 cm, 20G), while with US, deeper non-palpable veins were accessed using SPCs of 3.2 cm, 24G; and LPCs of 6.4 cm, 22G; 6.4 cm, 20G.

Results: The accesses were removed electively in 66% of US-PIVCs, with an average duration of the device of 5.3 ± 4.0 days, but only in 30% of Blind-PIVCs, which presented an average duration of 2.5 ± 1.8 days. The longest dwelling time (8.7 ± 5.1 days) was observed in 20G LPCs inserted with US into the basilic vein of the arm; among Blind-PIVCs, the longest duration (3.0 ± 2.1 days) was observed in 22G SPCs inserted into the cephalic vein at the forearm. The most commonly encountered complication in both groups was accidental dislodgment.

Conclusions: PIVCs with ultrasound guidance were apparently more effective than the blind ones, reducing the number of successive cannulations. Additionally, LPCs, with their greater length compared to SPCs, have proven to be more durable and may be recommended as emergency venous access in children requiring peripheral access for 4-15 days. Dislodgement should be reduced by improving the securement of the device.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11297298241282369DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ultrasound guidance
12
retrospective study
8
venous access
8
peripheral cannulas
8
pivcs ultrasound
8
blind technique
8
average duration
8
inserted
6
peripheral
5
comparison peripheral
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Establishing paediatric DRLs is challenging due to sparse data availability. The objective was to assess paediatric fluoroscopic dose levels in Dutch clinical practice, as current diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) need updating following the European Guidelines on DRLs for Paediatric Imaging (PiDRL).

Material And Methods: Air Kerma-area Product (KAP) values were retrospectively collected from paediatric patients (0-18 years) who underwent fluoroscopic procedures in nine Dutch hospitals between 01-01-2017 and 01-06-2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Ultrasound-guided deep serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has recently gained popularity as an analgesic technique in breast surgery. However, the effectiveness of ultrasound depends largely on the quality of the equipment used, and the technique can be complicated by patient-related factors such as obesity. We hypothesized that the simpler open approach to deep SAP block would be non-inferior to the ultrasound-guided approach in providing analgesia for modified radical mastectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

DesignRandomized Controlled Trial.ObjectivePostoperative pain after lumbar spine surgery remains a clinical challenge. Fluoroscopy-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been proposed as a feasible technique for reducing pain and opioid use, particularly when ultrasound guidance is not available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) can cause radiation exposure and iodinated contrast material (ICM) damage. Here, we aimed to conclude the clinical benefits of image fusion (IF) guidance in EVAR in our center and share our experience on 0 ICM usage in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)-IF-guided EVAR and explore its feasibility.

Methods: All patients who underwent EVAR at our center between January 2018 and December 2024 were included in this study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The clinical benefit of using ICT for coronary stent optimization remains uncertain in randomized trials, in which a unique ICT was used in most cases.

Aim: To assess the clinical impact of intracoronary techniques (ICT) for stent optimization in high-risk patients.

Methods: The OPTI-XIENCE study is a prospective, observational, multicenter international study including high-risk patients undergoing coronary stenting, in whom any ICT was used for stent optimization at the operator's discretion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF