98%
921
2 minutes
20
Unlabelled: Motor cortical (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions increase corticospinal output and improve motor learning when delivered during sensorimotor mu rhythm trough but not peak phases, suggesting that the mechanisms supporting motor learning may be most active during mu trough phases. Based on these findings, we predicted that motor sequence learning-related corticospinal plasticity would be most evident when measured during mu trough phases. Healthy adults were assigned to either a sequence or no-sequence group. Participants in the sequence group practiced the implicit serial reaction time task (SRTT), which contained an embedded, repeating 12-item sequence. Participants in the no-sequence group practiced a version of the SRTT that contained no sequence. We measured mu phase-independent and mu phase-dependent MEP amplitudes using EEG-informed single-pulse TMS before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the SRTT in both groups. All participants performed a retention test one hour after SRTT acquisition. In both groups, mu phase-independent MEP amplitudes increased following SRTT acquisition, but the pattern of mu phase-dependent MEP amplitude changes after SRTT acquisition differed between groups. Relative to the no-sequence group, the sequence group showed greater peak-specific MEP amplitude increases 30 minutes after SRTT acquisition. Further, the magnitude of these peak-specific MEP amplitude increases was negatively associated with the magnitude of sequence-specific learning. Contrary to our original hypothesis, results revealed that motor sequence-specific learning elicits peak-specific corticospinal plasticity. Findings provide first direct evidence for the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.
New And Noteworthy: Recent work suggests that motor learning's neural mechanisms may be most active during specific sensorimotor mu rhythm phases. If so, motor sequence learning-induced corticospinal plasticity should be more evident during some mu phases than others. Our results show that motor sequence-specific learning elicits corticospinal plasticity that is most prominent during mu peak phases. Further, this peak-specific plasticity correlates with learning. Findings establish the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361050 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.31.606022 | DOI Listing |
Neurol Res
September 2025
Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Background: Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) leads to partial or complete sensorimotor loss because of the spinal lesions caused either by trauma or any pathological conditions. Rehabilitation, one of the therapeutic methods, is considered to be a significant part of therapy supporting patients with spinal cord injury. Newer methods are being incorporated, such as repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), a Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) technique to induce changes in the residual neuronal pathways, facilitating cortical excitability and neuroplasticity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFeNeuro
September 2025
Department of Neurology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 78229.
The corticospinal tract (CST) is essential for forelimb-specific fine motor skills. In rodents, it undergoes extensive structural remodeling across development, injury, and disease states, with major implications for motor function. A vast body of literature, spanning numerous injury models, frequently assesses these projections.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuroimage
August 2025
Movement & Neuroscience, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address:
Learning a new motor skill relies on functional reorganization of the human central nervous system (CNS). Plasticity may shape the transmission and communication between cortical regions and between cortical and spinal networks involved in sensorimotor control, but little is known about the influence of age on these adaptations. In a series of experiments, we investigated whether changes in cortical and corticospinal functional connectivity following motor practice differ among individuals at different stages of development (age range 8-30 years old).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci Methods
August 2025
Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care and Stroke Service, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Center for Neurorestorat
Background: Normative maps of brain tracts are key tools for assessing the extent of tract injury and plasticity after brain lesions such as stroke. The conventional procedure for tract mapping reduces diffusion tractography streamlines to a volumetric image before warping them to a standard coordinate space. Unfortunately, this volumetric reduction discards information about tract connectivity across voxels, complicating estimation of tract injury from the resulting map.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImaging Neurosci (Camb)
January 2025
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can influence corticospinal excitability and motor skill acquisition. However, the evidence for these effects is inconsistent, and a common neural substrate for these effects has not been directly demonstrated. To address this, we hypothesized that higher tDCS intensities would produce more robust effects, and uncover their relationship.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF