A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Psychiatr Res

Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China; Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, 23003

Published: October 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), is an emerging intervention that has been used to treat various mental illnesses. However, previous studies have not comprehensively compared the efficacies of various NIBS modalities in alleviating anxiety symptoms among patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of NIBS for patients with GAD.

Methods: A systematic search of four major bibliographic databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library) was conducted from inception dates to November 26, 2023 to identify eligible studies. The data were analyzed using a random-effects model.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. Significant differences were found in changes in Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS) scores, study-defined response, and remission between the intervention and control groups. Moreover, the intervention groups experienced a significantly higher frequency of headaches.

Conclusion: The results revealed that interventions improved GAD compared to control groups. cTBS and rTMS exhibited better treatment efficacy than tDCS, which did not appear to have a significant therapeutic effect. Longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes are required in future RCTs.

Trial Registration: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered at PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42023466285).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.046DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-invasive brain
8
brain stimulation
8
generalized anxiety
8
anxiety disorder
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
control groups
8
stimulation
5
stimulation treatment
4
treatment generalized
4

Similar Publications