Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Introduction: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess the relative efficacy at 52 weeks (Wk52) of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or who had a previous inadequate response or an intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR).
Methods: Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from the bimekizumab trials BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data on patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 1 trial (NCT01009086; 45 mg, N = 205; 90 mg; N = 204) and a subgroup of TNFi-IR patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 2 trial (NCT01077362; 45 mg, N = 60; 90 mg, N = 58), respectively. Patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of the ustekinumab trial patients. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Non-placebo-adjusted comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and ustekinumab outcomes for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria (non-responder imputation) were analyzed.
Results: In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 45 mg: 2.14 [1.35, 3.40]; 90 mg: 1.98 [1.24, 3.16]), ACR50 (45 mg: 2.74 [1.75, 4.29]; 90 mg: 2.29 [1.48, 3.55]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 3.33 [2.04, 5.46]; 90 mg: 3.05 [1.89, 4.91]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (45 mg: 4.17 [2.13, 8.16]; 90 mg: 4.19 [2.07, 8.49]), ACR50 (45 mg: 5.00 [2.26, 11.05]; 90 mg: 3.86 [1.70, 8.79]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 9.85 [2.79, 34.79]; 90 mg: 6.29 [1.98, 20.04]).
Conclusions: Using MAIC, bimekizumab showed greater efficacy than ustekinumab in achieving all ACR responses in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52.
Trial Registration: NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT01009086, NCT01077362.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422334 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-024-00705-x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Where we Live matters: Varied Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States.
Arthritis Rheumatol
September 2025
Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, social deprivation, insurance coverage, and medication use across regional subsets of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the US.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of PsA patients in the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry between January 2020 and March2023 was conducted. Distribution of high disease activity (HDA - RAPID3>12), high comorbidity (RxRisk ≥90 percentile), high Area Deprivation Index (ADI ≥80), insurance coverage, prednisone ≥10mg daily, and all DMARD therapies across geographic regions were evaluated.
Literature analysis and implication of biologic therapy for children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in real-world settings.
Intractable Rare Dis Res
August 2025
Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatological disease in children. Besides the more severe systemic form, non-systemic JIA is divided into 5 different subgroups. Polyarticular JIA (polyJIA), particularly rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive, which is defined as the disease involving five or more joints in the first 6 months of disease, has the worst prognosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIncidence and Predictors of Secondary Failure to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.
J Rheumatol
September 2025
D.D. Gladman, Gladman Krembil Psoriatic Arthritis Program, Centre For Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto,
Objective: Secondary failure to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) is challenging and contributes to the complexity of managing psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We aimed to define the frequency and incidence of this phenomenon in PsA and identify the risk factors for its occurrence.
Methods: We retrieved data on PsA patients from our single-centre, specialized-care, prospective observational cohort who initiated and remained on bDMARDs for ≥1 year after clinic enrollment between 2000 and 2023.
The Association betweend Rheumatoid Arthritis and Stroke Risk by Serologic Status and Stroke Subtypes.
Int J Stroke
August 2025
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an increased stroke risk, but associations by serostatus (seropositive RA (SPRA) vs. seronegative RA (SNRA)) and with subtypes of stroke (ischemic stroke (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke (HS)) are not well established. In addition, it is not well-known whether the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are associated with altered stroke risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSingle-Center Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patients with RA, SpA, and PsA: Data from the Prescription Database.
J Pers Med
August 2025
Multidimensional Medicine Department, USL-Toscana Centro, 50143 Florence, Italy.
. The Italian Committee for Tailored BIOlogic Therapy (ITABIO), in a first report, has reviewed the literature to identify the best strategy for the choice of second-line biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). To verify the application of ITABIO recommendations in real life and how the recommendations perform in maintaining the health status of patients affected by inflammatory arthritis (RA, SpA, PsA), a database has been developed by Pharmaceutical Governance to evaluate the appropriateness of prescriptions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF