Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study explores the under-investigated area of obesity-related discrimination and stigmatization across different countries, specifically comparing Spain (Europe) and Egypt (Middle East).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study involving 2,090 participants from both countries. Participants completed three well-validated questionnaires to assess their attitudes toward obesity, experiences of weight-related stigma, and internalization of weight bias: Antifat Attitudes Scale (AFA), Stigmatizing Situations Inventory (SSI), and Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS). Participants were categorized into four groups based on body mass index (BMI) and history bariatric surgery.

Results: Egyptian participants (BMI = 30.2 ± 6.7 kg/m2 [range: 18.5-69.0 kg/m2]) showed significantly higher aversion toward obesity, as indicated by higher AFA score, compared to their Spanish counterparts (BMI = 35.4 ± 10.1 kg/m2 [18.5-71.9 kg/m2]). In contrast, Spanish participants reported higher levels of weight bias internalization with increasing BMI, while in Egypt, this association was negative. The association of bariatric surgery on stigma reduction also differed between the countries. Multivariate analysis revealed that residing in Egypt was an independent risk factor for higher scores in AFA and WBIS (odds ratio 8.20 [95% confidence interval: 6.78-9.62], p < 0.001 and odds ratio (OR) 6.28 [95% CI: 4.78-7.78], p < 0.001, respectively). In contrast, Spaniards experienced more stigmatizing situations than Egyptians (OR -2.54 [95% CI: 6.78-9.62], p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study underscores the complex and diverse nature of obesity-related attitudes across cultures. Understanding these cultural differences is crucial for developing effective, culturally sensitive strategies to tackle weight stigma. This research opens avenues for further studies and interventions tailored to cultural contexts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661836PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000540635DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weight bias
12
stigmatizing situations
8
bias internalization
8
odds ratio
8
study
5
participants
5
discrimination stigma
4
stigma associated
4
associated obesity
4
obesity comparative
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To quantify agreement between oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive arterial blood pressure (IBP) in infants <500 g during the first postnatal week.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort of infants with a birth weight <500 g admitted to a tertiary NICU (2011-2023). Paired IBP-NIBP readings obtained within 1 min were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Multiple non-pharmacological and nonsurgical interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving abdominal obesity. However, the optimal intervention remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the relative effectiveness and safety of these interventions in reducing waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body mass index (BMI), and body weight among adults with abdominal obesity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The growing approval and use of digital therapeutics (DTx) for managing chronic diseases, such as diabetes, has prompted questions about their effectiveness.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to report the effectiveness of DTx interventions in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and prediabetes.

Methods: Data sources, including Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to July 30, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing global health concern, particularly among individuals with obesity. While metabolic and behavioral risk factors have been well described, the role of psychosocial determinants, such as weight stigma, remains underexplored.

Objectives: To assess the association between sociodemographic variables, healthy lifestyle behaviors, and internalized weight stigma with MASLD risk in a large cohort of obese workers across Spain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk models routinely adjust for endoscopic screening because of a) possible confounding with other risk factors and b) possible alteration of natural history of the disease due to adenoma detection and removal.

Methods: In this study, we defined a subject as screen-covered (SC) if a colonoscopy was performed in the past 10 years, and not screen-covered (NSC) otherwise. We created CRC risk models separately for SC and NSC subjects (HRSC, HRNSC) and then obtained a screening-coverage adjusted HR estimate (HRfull) based on a weighted average of ln(HRSC) and ln(HRNSC) with weight equal to the proportion of SC person-time in the NHS population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF