Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003431 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A National Cancer Database Analysis of the Trends in Conversion from Robotic-Assisted Proctectomy to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
September 2025
Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) has been reportedly associated with lower rates of conversion to laparotomy than laparoscopy in several cohort studies. This st0udy aimed to assess the temporal trends in conversion from RAP to laparotomy stratified by patient and treatment-related factors. This retrospective observational study was undertaken to analyse the temporal trends in unplanned conversion from RAP to laparotomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRestorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical approach for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) seeking bowel continuity. While laparoscopy improves recovery, robotic-assisted surgery may offer advantages in pelvic procedures. However, its comparative efficacy remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparing robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer surgical and oncological outcomes.
Front Surg
August 2025
Department of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Background: Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) is increasingly used for rectal cancer, but its long-term benefits over laparoscopic proctectomy (LP) remain debated. While RAP offers technical advantages, its clinical equivalence requires further validation, particularly in anatomically challenging cases.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all eligible patients who underwent RAP or LP for rectal cancer at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between 2019 and 2024.
Clinical value of fluorescence laparoscopic surgery on anastomotic leakage prevention in ultra-low rectal cancer: real-world multicenter retrospective evidence with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy stratification.
Tech Coloproctol
August 2025
Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is key for low rectal cancer but raises the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL). This study examines how fluorescence laparoscopic (FL) surgery reduces AL after intersphincteric resection (ISR), especially in nCRT patients.
Methods: This real-world multicenter cohort study included 533 patients undergoing laparoscopic ISR for ultra-low rectal adenocarcinoma from January 2012 to July 2023.
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes among laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excision procedures in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis.
Tech Coloproctol
August 2025
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the oncologic standard for rectal cancer surgery; however, technical challenges persist in the minimally invasive treatment of low rectal cancer. Transanal TME (TaTME) and robotic TME were developed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic TME in confined pelvic spaces. Despite promising results, comparative evidence among these approaches remains limited and heterogeneous.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF