98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: In standard weaning from mechanical ventilation, a successful spontaneous breathing test (SBT) consisting of 30 min 8 cmHO pressure-support ventilation (PSV8) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is followed by extubation with continuous suctioning; however, these practices might promote derecruitment. Evidence supports the feasibility and safety of extubation without suctioning. Ultrasound can assess lung aeration and respiratory muscles. We hypothesize that weaning aiming to preserve lung volume can yield higher rates of successful extubation.
Methods: This multicenter superiority trial will randomly assign eligible patients to receive either standard weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 without PEEP followed by extubation with continuous suctioning] or lung-volume-preservation weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 + 5 cmHO PEEP followed by extubation with positive pressure without suctioning]. We will compare the rates of successful extubation and reintubation, ICU and hospital stays, and ultrasound measurements of the volume of aerated lung (modified lung ultrasound score), diaphragm and intercostal muscle thickness, and thickening fraction before and after successful or failed SBT. Patients will be followed for 90 days after randomization.
Discussion: We aim to recruit a large sample of representative patients (N = 1600). Our study cannot elucidate the specific effects of PEEP during SBT and of positive pressure during extubation; the results will show the joint effects derived from the synergy of these two factors. Although universal ultrasound monitoring of lungs, diaphragm, and intercostal muscles throughout weaning is unfeasible, if derecruitment is a major cause of weaning failure, ultrasound may help clinicians decide about extubation in high-risk and borderline patients.
Trial Registration: The Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals approved the study (CEI 22/67 and 23/26). Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in August 2023. Identifier: NCT05526053.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11251308 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08297-1 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Anaesthesiol
September 2025
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (AZV), Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Evaristo Garcia, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia (AZV), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, H
Background: Individualisation of positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is an open-lung ventilation strategy associated with better respiratory mechanics. Mechanical power has been associated with lung injury in critical care settings, but the interaction between optimisation of PEEP and mechanical power during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains poorly understood.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of individualisation of PEEP on mechanical power during OLV as well as to establish the association between mechanical power and postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery.
BMC Anesthesiol
August 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Kunming Children's Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, 650100, China.
Background: Pediatric laparoscopic surgery often induces atelectasis due to pneumoperitoneum, postural changes, and immature respiratory physiology, increasing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Fixed PEEP may fail to address perioperative variability. This study evaluated whether dynamic PEEP adjustment reduces atelectasis and improves oxygenation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
August 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital (Affiliated Fifth People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Chengdu, China.
Objective: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is widely used during surgery, but its effects on lung and brain protection remain debated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of individualized PEEP on lung ultrasound score (LUS) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
Methods: Forty-six patients aged 60-79 years undergoing laparoscopic rectal tumour resection between June 2022 and December 2022 were randomized into two groups: Group E (individualized PEEP guided by driving pressure) and Group C (control group, PEEP = 5 cm H2O).
Intensive Care Med Exp
August 2025
Kernel Biomedical, 18 Rue Marie Curie Bâtiment ANIDER, 76000, Rouen, France.
Background: Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) are crucial for determining when mechanically ventilated patients are ready for extubation. While pressure support (PS) and T-piece trials are commonly used, humidified high-flow (HHF) is increasingly considered, but its physiological effects remain unclear. This bench study compares T-piece, PS, and HHF modalities, evaluating their impact on work of breathing (WOB), tidal volume (Vt), total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot) and CO clearance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSemin Perinatol
August 2025
Promedica Ebeid Children's Hospital, 2142N. Cove Blvd, Toledo, OH 43606, USA. Electronic address:
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is an innovative ventilation mode that empowers patients to control both the timing and level of ventilatory support. By utilizing the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) as the control signal, NAVA enables synchronized non-invasive ventilation (NIV-NAVA) even in the presence of leaks, while also providing continuous monitoring of the patient's respiratory pattern and drive. NIV-NAVA offers several advantages compared to conventional non-invasive ventilation, including enhanced patient-ventilator interaction and synchrony, reliable respiratory monitoring, and self-regulation of respiratory support.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF