Probability overestimation induced by icon arrays.

Acta Psychol (Amst)

Faculty of Psychology, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan. Electronic address:

Published: August 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

In decision making under risk, where the consequences of choices vary depending on specific probabilities, a proper interpretation of the presented probabilities is essential. However, because people are not good at evaluating numerical values, such as percentages, efforts have been made to accurately convey presented probabilities using visual aids represented by icon arrays. However, previous studies have suggested that icon arrays produce an overestimation of probabilities under specific conditions. Especially, (a) the arrangement of highlighted icons and (b) the severity of the outcomes represented by highlighted icons can lead to an overestimation of probabilities. By considering the absolute estimation of probabilities indicated by icon arrays and manipulating the aforementioned factors, this study investigated whether these factors could elicit an overestimation of probabilities in an additive manner or whether they have interactive effects. Two studies (total N = 1171) consistently showed that the arrangement of highlighted icons and the outcome severity they indicate induced a perceptual bias in the estimation of the probabilities presented in icon arrays in an additive manner. When the highlighted icons were random and the outcomes they indicate were severe, the probabilities presented by the icon arrays were overestimated. Accordingly, the study not only confirms the robustness of the findings of previous studies but also expand our understanding of the probability overestimation caused by icon arrays. Here, we discuss our findings in terms of the impact of risk-related communication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104352DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

icon arrays
28
highlighted icons
16
overestimation probabilities
12
probabilities
9
probability overestimation
8
presented probabilities
8
previous studies
8
arrangement highlighted
8
estimation probabilities
8
additive manner
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Amivantamab plus lazertinib significantly improved progression-free and overall survival versus osimertinib in patients with previously untreated, EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. EGFR-targeted therapies are associated with dermatologic adverse events (AEs), which can affect quality of life (QoL). COCOON was conducted to assess prophylactic management and improve treatment experience.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: For rare skin cancers, few data exist on the outcome of systemic therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). The present study analysed the real-world use of different systemic therapies including ICI, and its outcome in patients with advanced rare skin cancers.

Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients who received systemic therapy for advanced, non-resectable cutaneous angiosarcoma (AS), Kaposi sarcoma (KS), pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS), or cutaneous adnexal carcinoma (CAC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Visualizing risk: Risk graphics' impact on patient understanding and choices in discrete choice experiments.

Soc Sci Med

August 2025

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus Centre for Health

Eliciting risk preferences is crucial in health research, yet little empirical evidence exists on which graphic types best support respondents' understanding of risks in stated preference studies, such as Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE). This study uses a mixed-methods approach to identify the most suitable risk graphics for patient preference studies using DCEs. For this purpose, a literature research, thirteen structured cognitive interviews, a randomized-controlled DCE with three study arms (N = 1,669), and a randomized-controlled DCE with two study arms (N = 630) linked to revealed preference data (N = 604) were conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To explore stakeholders' views on acceptable and feasible strategies for discussion of treatment options and risk communication with people with limited health literacy (LHL in the context of shared decision-making (SDM)).

Methods: This qualitative descriptive study used purposive sampling to conduct focus groups with stakeholders including experts in health literacy, SDM, or risk communication (RC); experienced General Practitioners (GPs); and individuals with LHL. Each session included a brief presentation defining SDM, option talk, and RC, followed by an introduction to various RC strategies and decision aids to facilitate discussion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Incident Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk.

J Am Coll Cardiol

August 2025

TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address:

Background: The clinical utility of a heart failure (HF) polygenic risk score (PRS) is uncertain.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of an HF PRS to predict new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk.

Methods: An HF PRS (>1 million single nucleotide variations) was used to stratify individuals from 7 clinical studies to low (quintile [Q] 1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF