Angiography-versus wire-based microvascular resistance index to detect coronary microvascular obstruction associated with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: Microvascular obstruction (MVO) measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has important prognostic implications. While invasive index of microvascular resistance (IMR) have been shown to predict the occurrence and extent of MVO, the role of the angiography-based microvascular resistance (Angio-IMR) for this purpose remains unknown. The present study aims to perform a head-to-head comparison of wire-based and angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance (IMR and Angio-IMR, respectively) for the detection of MVO.

Methods: Patients with a first STEMI and multivessel disease underwent CMR for detection of MVO, and angio-IMR and IMR measurements during PPCI and at 30 day follow up, both in STEMI culprit and non-culprit vessels.

Results: 58 patients were included (mean age 60.7 ± 9.9 years, 82% male). At the time of PPCI, angio-IMR and IMR exhibited significant correlation (r = 0.70, P < 0.001), and agreement (coefficient of agreement 0.58). Both indices showed good predictive value of MVO [Angio IMR: AUC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.667-0.928); IMR: AUC 0.70 (95% CI: 0.539-0.853); p = 0.15]. Angio-IMR 40 U and IMR 34 U were identified as best cut-offs for prediction of MVO. In non-culprit vessels, angio-IMR and IMR also correlated well (rho = 0.59, p < 0.001), with overall lower mean values compared to culprit vessels (Angio-IMR: 36 vs. 23; IMR: 39 vs. 22, p < 0.001 for both comparisons).

Conclusion: Angio-IMR constitutes a valid alternative to wire-based IMR in predicting MVO in STEMI. Angio-IMR and IMR show a good correlation in the acute and subacute STEMI phases, both in culprit and non-culprit vessels.