Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model on the efficacy of intracranial aneurysm detection in CT angiography (CTA) and its influence on patients' short-term and long-term outcomes.

Methods: Study design: Prospective, multicenter, double-blinded RCT.

Settings: The model was designed for the automatic detection of intracranial aneurysms from original CTA images.

Participants: Adult inpatients and outpatients who are scheduled for head CTA scanning. Randomization groups: (1) Experimental Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the True-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (True-AI arm). (2) Control Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the Sham-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (Sham-AI arm).

Randomization: Block randomization, stratified by center, gender, and age group.

Primary Outcomes: Coprimary outcomes of superiority in patient-level sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity for the True-AI arm to the Sham-AI arm in intracranial aneurysms.

Secondary Outcomes: Diagnostic performance for other intracranial lesions, detection rates, workload of CTA interpretation, resource utilization, treatment-related clinical events, aneurysm-related events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Blinding: Study participants and participating radiologists will be blinded to the intervention.

Sample Size: Based on our pilot study, the patient-level sensitivity is assumed to be 0.65 for the Sham-AI arm and 0.75 for the True-AI arm, with specificities of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms for patients undergoing head CTA in the hospital is approximately 12%. To establish superiority in sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity with a margin of 5% using a one-sided α = 0.025 to ensure that the power of coprimary endpoint testing reached 0.80 and a 5% attrition rate, the sample size was determined to be 6450 in a 1:1 allocation to True-AI or Sham-AI arm.

Discussion: The study will determine the precise impact of the AI system on the detection performance for intracranial aneurysms in a double-blinded design and following the real-world effects on patients' short-term and long-term outcomes.

Trial Registration: This trial has been registered with the NIH, U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06118840 . Registered 11 November 2023.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151720PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08184-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracranial aneurysm
16
head cta
16
multicenter double-blinded
12
intracranial aneurysms
12
true-ai arm
12
intracranial
9
impact artificial
8
aneurysm detection
8
detection angiography
8
double-blinded randomized
8

Similar Publications

Application of high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography for evaluation of endothelialization after flow diverter implantation for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

September 2025

From the Department of Interventional Radiology (Shuailong Shi, Shuhai Long, Ji Ma, Peijie Lu, Jie Yang, Ye Wang, Tengfei Li), The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China; The School of Life Science and Technology (Zhike Zhang), Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; an

Background And Purpose: Although high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (HR-CBCT) is used for immediate evaluation of stent apposition, studies using this technique to evaluate flow diverter (FD) endothelialization during follow-up are limited. The study aims to investigate the potential of HR-CBCT in assessing FD endothelialization and identify factors influencing poor endothelialization.

Materials And Methods: The clinical and imaging data of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) treated by FDs from March 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prediction of severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage before rupture: Insights from a retrospective study.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg

September 2025

Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Center for Translational Neuro, & Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg Essen, Germany.

Objective: Accurate prediction of the initial severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is important for effective management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IA). This study aims to investigate patient and IA characteristics as pre-rupture predictors of severe aSAH.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included all patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with acute aSAH at our center between January 2003 and June 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BackgroundEndovascular coil embolization is a common treatment for intracranial aneurysms, but aneurysm recanalization remains a significant problem that may necessitate retreatment. This study aimed to identify patient, aneurysm, and procedural factors associated with recanalization in aneurysms treated exclusively with coil embolization.MethodsThis single center retrospective study assessed intracranial aneurysms treated with coiling-only between 2017 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report a 64-year-old woman who developed symptomatic vasospasm on postoperative day 7 after clipping of an unruptured right middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm. Imaging revealed right MCA vasospasm, which resolved with oral antiplatelets and intravenous vasodilators. She was discharged without neurological deficits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Flow-diverting (FD) stents are increasingly used to treat small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA), but high-quality, unbiased data on initial complications and clinical outcomes were limited in previous literature reviews. We updated the literature review to assess quality, potential bias, complications and short-term outcomes in studies on FD-stents for UIAs.

Patients And Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until January 9, 2025 for studies on FD-stents for UIAs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF