98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation carries the risk of silent cerebral event (SCE) and silent cerebral lesion (SCL). Although "silent," these may have long-term clinical implications and are challenging to study as postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not standard of care.
Objective: The neurological assessment subgroup (NAS) of ADVENT compared cerebral effects of pulsed field ablation (PFA) with standard-of-care thermal ablation.
Methods: The NAS included consecutive randomized PFA and thermal ablation patients who received postprocedural brain MRI 12-48 hours after ablation. Patients with apparent SCE or SCL findings underwent a modified Rankin scale assessment. MRI images were subsequently reviewed by a blinded brain imaging core laboratory.
Results: In total, 77 patients with paroxysmal AF were enrolled at 6 centers; 71 had analyzable scans (34 PFA; 37 thermal ablation). Through individual center review, 6 PFA and 4 thermal scans were identified as SCE/SCL positive, of which 3 PFA and 0 thermal SCE/SCL findings were confirmed by a blinded core laboratory. MRI findings revealed 1 patient with 2- to 4-mm SCEs, 1 patient with a 3-mm SCE, and 1 patient with 2 SCLs (5.5 mm and 11 mm). All modified Rankin scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were 0 before discharge and at 90-day follow-up. There were only 2 neurological safety events (1 transient ischemic attack [PFA] and 1 stroke [thermal ablation]) in the ADVENT study, neither of which was part of the NAS.
Conclusion: The ADVENT trial provides the first prospective, randomized data on the cerebral impact of PFA and thermal ablation of AF. Incidence of SCE/SCL after ablation in the NAS was low.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.048 | DOI Listing |
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
September 2025
Endeavor Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) offers several advantages compared to thermal ablation, however direct comparisons of patient-reported outcomes after PFA and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are limited. This study aimed to assess patient experience following PFA or RFA in AF ablation performed under general anesthesia.
Methods: A retrospective study across a single integrated health system was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent PFA or RFA for AF under general anesthesia from March 2024 to December 2024.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
September 2025
Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Cerrahpasa University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, linked to thermal injuries by conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cryo-balloon (CB) ablation techniques. AEF risk can be mitigated by considering several measures such as tailored power settings of ablation technique, mechanical displacement of esophagus, esophageal cooling, and alternative ablative techniques and energy sources. We review the current knowledge regarding AEF and esophageal thermal injuries as well as discussing the current research regarding a novel none-to-minimally thermal, myocardial tissue-selective modality known as pulsed-field ablation (PFA) which may mitigate such risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiosens Bioelectron
August 2025
Georgia Tech - Emory University, Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, USA. Electronic address:
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an alternative to thermal techniques in treating cardiac arrhythmias due to the better safety profile and similar efficacy. However, lack of deep electric field penetration has led to incomplete transmural lesions and 1-year recurrence rates of ∼30 %. Electroporation induces non-linear increases in tissue electrical conductivity, influencing the electric field distribution and subsequent ablation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomedicines
July 2025
Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF), offering myocardial selectivity through irreversible electroporation while sparing surrounding structures. However, concerns have emerged regarding potential subclinical hemolysis, reflected by alterations in biochemical markers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving 249 patients undergoing PVI: 121 treated with PFA (PulseSelect or FARAPULSE) and 128 with radiofrequency (RF) ablation (PVAC catheter).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComput Methods Programs Biomed
November 2025
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Background And Objective: As a non-thermal ablation modality, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been widely applied in solid tumor treatment and cardiac ablation. Multiple factors are known to influence the effects of PFA, including pulse parameters, catheter configurations, and tissue properties. However, limited attention has been paid to the impact of discharge modes on PFA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF