On the Capabilities of Transition Metal Carbides for Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies.

ACS Appl Mater Interfaces

Departament de Ciència de Materials i Química Física & Institut de Química Teòrica i Computacional (IQTCUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1-11, Barcelona 08028, Spain.

Published: June 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The search for cheap and active materials for the capture and activation of CO has led to many efforts aimed at developing new catalysts. In this context, earth-abundant transition metal carbides (TMCs) have emerged as promising candidates, garnering increased attention in recent decades due to their exceptional refractory properties and resistance to sintering, coking, and sulfur poisoning. In this work, we assess the use of Group 5 TMCs (VC, NbC, and TaC) as potential materials for carbon capture and sequestration/utilization technologies by combining experimental characterization techniques, first-principles-based multiscale modeling, vibrational analysis, and catalytic experiments. Our findings reveal that the stoichiometric phase of VC exhibits weak interactions with CO, displaying an inability to adsorb or dissociate it. However, VC often exhibits the presence of surface carbon vacancies, leading to significant activation of CO at room temperature and facilitating its catalytic hydrogenation. In contrast, stoichiometric NbC and TaC phases exhibit stronger interactions with CO, capable of adsorbing and even breaking of CO at low temperatures, particularly notable in the case of TaC. Nevertheless, NbC and TaC demonstrate poor catalytic performance for CO hydrogenation. This work suggests Group 5 TMCs as potential materials for CO abatement, emphasizes the importance of surface vacancies in enhancing catalytic activity and adsorption capability, and provides a reference for using the infrared spectra as a unique identifier to detect oxy-carbide phases or surface C vacancies within Group 5 TMCs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163407PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c03735DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group tmcs
12
nbc tac
12
transition metal
8
metal carbides
8
carbon capture
8
potential materials
8
surface vacancies
8
capabilities transition
4
carbides carbon
4
capture utilization
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: To analyze and compare the biomechanical differences and clinical efficacy of artificial vertebral bodies (AVBs) versus traditional titanium mesh cages (TMCs) reconstruction following total spondylectomy (TES).

Materials And Methods: Finite Element Analysis: A finite element model of T12-L5 vertebrae from a healthy adult was utilized to construct two reconstruction models following L2 TES: Group A (AVB) and Group B (TMC). Using ANSYS software, flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation loading conditions were simulated to comparatively analyze stress distribution at the prosthesis-endplate interface and biomechanical characteristics of the fixation system; Clinical research: This retrospective study included 20 thoracolumbar tumor patients who underwent posterior TES at our institution from January 2014 to October 2024, divided into AVBs ( = 10) and TMCs ( = 10) reconstruction groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices play a crucial role in improving survival for patients with hemodynamic instability by providing cardiac assistance, and may serve as either a bridge to recovery or destination therapy. Recently, the PulseCath (iVAC2L and iVAC3L) has been introduced into the broader tMCS landscape. Due to its ease of implantation and low cost, it appears to enhance and complement the spectrum of tMCS devices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion has not been shown to improve mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) but is increasingly used in heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS).

Objective: We sought to compare IABP-related outcomes in patients with HF-CS and AMI-CS.

Methods: The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry was queried for patients with CS receiving femoral IABPs as the first temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Treatment for the central sensitization component of lower back pain using systemic manual therapy.

J Bodyw Mov Ther

June 2025

Halili Physical Therapy, 268 E River Rd Suite 130, Tucson, AZ, 85704, USA. Electronic address:

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze treatments for central sensitization (CS) and other contributors to chronic lower back pain (CLBP), using systemic manual therapy (SMT) protocols based on the temporal model for CS (TMCS).

Design: Cohort retrospective multivariate analysis.

Methods: This study analyzed episode of care and rate of improvement data in 1053 patients, evaluating 715 protocol combinations of SMT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Orthotopic heart transplantation remains the gold standard for patients with end-stage heart failure. Many devices exist to bridge patients with heart failure to transplant. Impella 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF