Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of radiomic analysis on contrast-enhanced mammography images to identify different histotypes of breast cancer mainly in order to predict grading, to identify hormone receptors, to discriminate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and to identify luminal histotype of the breast cancer.

Methods: From four Italian centers were recruited 180 malignant lesions and 68 benign lesions. However, only the malignant lesions were considered for the analysis. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced mammography in cranium caudal (CC) and medium lateral oblique (MLO) view. Considering histological findings as the ground truth, four outcomes were considered: (1) G1 + G2 vs. G3; (2) HER2 + vs. HER2 - ; (3) HR + vs. HR - ; and (4) non-luminal vs. luminal A or HR + /HER2-  and luminal B or HR + /HER2 + . For multivariate analysis feature selection, balancing techniques and patter recognition approaches were considered.

Results: The univariate findings showed that the diagnostic performance is low for each outcome, while the results of the multivariate analysis showed that better performances can be obtained. In the HER2 + detection, the best performance (73% of accuracy and AUC = 0.77) was obtained using a linear regression model (LRM) with 12 features extracted by MLO view. In the HR + detection, the best performance (77% of accuracy and AUC = 0.80) was obtained using a LRM with 14 features extracted by MLO view. In grading classification, the best performance was obtained by a decision tree trained with three predictors extracted by MLO view reaching an accuracy of 82% on validation set. In the luminal versus non-luminal histotype classification, the best performance was obtained by a bagged tree trained with 15 predictors extracted by CC view reaching an accuracy of 94% on validation set.

Conclusions: The results suggest that radiomics analysis can be effectively applied to design a tool to support physician decision making in breast cancer classification. In particular, the classification of luminal versus non-luminal histotypes can be performed with high accuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01817-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mlo view
16
best performance
16
contrast-enhanced mammography
12
breast cancer
12
extracted mlo
12
analysis contrast-enhanced
8
identify histotypes
8
histotypes breast
8
malignant lesions
8
multivariate analysis
8

Similar Publications

Mammography is a primary method for early screening, and developing deep learning-based computer-aided systems is of great significance. However, current deep learning models typically treat each image as an independent entity for diagnosis, rather than integrating images from multiple views to diagnose the patient. These methods do not fully consider and address the complex interactions between different views, resulting in poor diagnostic performance and interpretability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are one of the most important radiation protection methods in medical imaging to help optimize radiation exposure during imaging procedures. The study aimed to establish national DRL for digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in Jordan, considering variations in compressed breast thickness (CBT) and breast density.

Methodology: The exposure parameters, average glandular dose (AGD), CBT, breast density, and viewing projection were extracted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improvement in matching lesions in dual-view mammograms using a geometric model.

BMC Med Imaging

August 2025

Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, PR China.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a geometric model (GM) as an adjunctive tool for radiologists to match lesions between craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral (MLO) views.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 711 patients who underwent mammography from January 2016 to August 2018. Two senior radiologists used bounding boxes to delineate lesions as the reference standard, calculated the absolute error (the shortest distance from the lesion center to the predicted curve) of GM, and compared it with the annular band (AB) and straight strip (SS) methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Breast positioning and compression are integral to digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging. Therefore, their accurate representation in computer simulations using anthropomorphic digital breast phantoms can be crucial. However, existing compression models often neglect external conditions, such as breast support elevation and radiographer handling, and lack quantitative validation against reference compressed breast shapes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study introduces a novel methodology to enhance nipple segmentation in digital mammography, a critical component for accurate medical analysis and computer-aided detection systems. The nipple is a key anatomical landmark for multi-view and multi-modality breast image registration, where accurate localization is vital for ensuring image quality and enabling precise registration of anomalies across different mammographic views. The proposed approach significantly outperforms baseline methods, particularly in challenging cases where previous techniques failed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF