High-resolution HLA genotyping improves PIRCHE-II assessment of molecular mismatching in kidney transplantation.

HLA matching in solid organ transplant is performed with the aim of assessing immunologic compatibility in order to avoid hyperacute rejection and assess the risk of future rejection events. Molecular mismatch algorithms are intended to improve granularity in histocompatibility assessment and risk stratification. PIRCHE-II uses HLA genotyping to predict indirectly presented mismatched donor HLA peptides, though most clinical validation studies rely on imputing high resolution (HR) genotypes from low resolution (LR) typing data. We hypothesized that use of bona fide HR typing could overcome limitations in imputation, improving accuracy and predictive ability for donor-specific antibody development and acute rejection. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult and pediatric kidney transplant donor/recipient pairs (N = 419) with HR typing and compared the use of imputed LR genotyping verses HR genotyping for PIRCHE-II analysis and outcomes. Imputation success was highly dependent on the reference population used, as using historic Caucasian reference populations resulted in 10 % of pairs with unsuccessful imputation while multiethnic reference populations improved successful imputation with only 1 % unable to be imputed. Comparing PIRCHE-II analysis with HR and LR genotyping produced notably different results, with 20 % of patients discrepantly classified to immunologic risk groups. These data emphasize the importance of using multiethnic reference panels when performing imputation and indicate HR HLA genotyping has clinically meaningful benefit for PIRCHE-II analysis compared to imputed LR typing.