98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Subjects with a fragility fracture have an increased risk of a new fracture and should receive effective strategies to prevent new events. The medium-term to long-term strategy should be scheduled by considering the mechanisms of action in therapy and the estimated fracture risk.
Objective: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the sequential strategy in patients with or at risk of a fragility fracture in the context of the development of the Italian Guidelines.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources And Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were investigated up to February 2021 to update the search of a recent systematic review. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the sequential therapy of antiresorptive, anabolic treatment, or placebo in patients with or at risk of a fragility fracture were eligible. Three authors independently extracted data and appraised the risk of bias in the included studies. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using fixed-effects models. The primary outcome was the risk of refracture, while the secondary outcome was the bone mineral density (BMD) change.
Results: In all, 17 RCTs, ranging from low to high quality, met our inclusion criteria. A significantly reduced risk of fracture was detected at (i) 12 or 24 months after the switch from romosozumab to denosumab placebo to denosumab; (ii) 30 months from teriparatide to bisphosphonates placebo to bisphosphonates; and (iii) 12 months from romosozumab to alendronate the only alendronate therapy (specifically for vertebral fractures). In general, at 2 years after the switch from anabolic to antiresorptive drugs, a weighted BMD was increased at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck site.
Conclusion: The Task Force formulated recommendations on sequential therapy, which is the first treatment with anabolic drugs or 'bone builders' in patients with very high or imminent risk of fracture.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036926 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X241234584 | DOI Listing |
Disabil Rehabil
September 2025
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Purpose: To develop a comprehensive ICF Core Set (ICF-CS) for vertebral fragility fracture.
Materials And Methods: The development of ICF-CSs involves three phases: i) systematic literature review and qualitative studies; ii) linking process to identify the ICF codes and categories; iii) international consensus process. i) We performed a literature search and qualitative studies with people with vertebral fragility fractures and healthcare professionals; ii) We linked the findings from the search and qualitative studies to the ICF categories, and drafted the proposed ICF-CS; iii) We performed an international consensus process involving experts with clinical or research experience in management of vertebral fragility fractures.
Musculoskelet Surg
September 2025
1st Orthopedic Department, IRCCS - Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Introduction: Sarcopenia is a pathologic condition frequent in aged population, leading to functional and cognitive impairment. Given the ageing of the population worldwide, the topic has generated interest in the last decades and is expected to be more relevant in the near future. This paper aims to present the mechanism of sarcopenia, the current state of knowledge regarding diagnosis and treatment and the role of sarcopenia in orthopaedic and traumatological settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArch Osteoporos
September 2025
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Unlabelled: The National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) has updated the revised UK guideline for the assessment and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years and older. This guideline is relevant for all healthcare professionals involved in osteoporosis management.
Introduction: The UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) first produced a guideline on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in 2008, with updates in 2013, 2017 and 2021.
Osteoporos Int
September 2025
International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland.
Unlabelled: The study explored osteoporosis patients' views on the disease in six LATAM countries. All were diagnosed for over 3 years, 65% avoiding fragility fractures. Sixteen used osteoporosis drugs, trusting physicians most.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthroplast Today
October 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has theoretical advantages and disadvantages over hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Numerous studies have suggested equivalent reoperation rates between the procedures. The purpose of this study was to use the reverse fragility index (RFI) to evaluate the statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting nonsignificant differences in reoperation rates between hip hemiarthroplasty and THA for femoral neck fractures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF