A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A dual RPA-LFD assay for the simultaneous detection of and . | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

was one of the most common bacteria that caused foodborne illness, with () and () infections accounting for more than 75% of human salmonella infections. In this study, we developed a method of dual recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) combined with a lateral flow dipstick for the rapid detection of and in clinical specimens (stool). The entire reaction process, including amplification and result reading, could be completed within 65 min. The detection limits of and in pure culture samples were 5.23 × 10 CFU/mL and 3.59 × 10 CFU/mL, respectively. The detection limits of and in artificially contaminated samples were 8.30 × 10 CFU/mL and 2.70 × 10 CFU/mL, respectively. In addition, the method had no cross-reaction with other pathogenic microorganisms. The results in clinical samples were fully consistent with those obtained using Bacterial Analysis Manual, with sensitivity and specificity were 100% (8/8) and 100% (17/17) for and 100% (4/4) and 100% (21/21) for , respectively. The detection limits of and in artificially contaminated samples were higher than those in pure culture samples, which might be attributed to the inherent complex composition of artificially contaminated samples. In addition, the detection limits of and in the same sample were also different, which might be attributed to different amplification efficiency of two target genes in the same reaction system. This assay had potential application outdoors, as it could be performed within 1 h at 38°C without a complex instrument, and the results could be observed with the naked eye. In conclusion, the dual RPA-LFD assay established in this study had practical significance for the rapid detection of and in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958489PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1379939DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

detection limits
16
artificially contaminated
12
contaminated samples
12
dual rpa-lfd
8
rpa-lfd assay
8
rapid detection
8
pure culture
8
culture samples
8
limits artificially
8
detection
7

Similar Publications