Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: This study ascertains the effects of the pre-entry tuberculosis (TB) screening policy, which was implemented as a strategy for managing TB among immigrants, on the treatment outcomes of immigrants in South Korea.

Methods: This study linked three different datasets from 2013 to 2018, namely (1) Korean National Tuberculosis Surveillance System; (2) National Health Information Database for patients diagnosed with TB with ICD code A15-A19, B90, or U84.3; and (3) Statistics Korea database related to cause of deaths. To identify the effect of the policy, cohorts comprising Korean and immigrant TB patients notified before (January 1, 2013-December 31, 2015) and after (September 1, 2016-December 31, 2018), the implementations of the policy were established. A difference-in-differences (DID) analysis of the treatment success and mortality rates was performed.

Results: Data from 100,262 TB patients were included in the analysis (before policy implementation: 1240 immigrants and 65,723 Koreans; after policy implementation: 256 immigrants and 33,043 Koreans). The propensity score matching-DID analysis results showed that the difference in the treatment success rate between immigrants and Koreans decreased significantly, from 16% before to 6% after the policy implementation. The difference in the mortality rate between the two groups decreased from - 3% before to - 1% after the policy implementation; however, this difference was insignificant.

Conclusion: The treatment outcomes of immigrant TB patients in South Korea improved after the implementation of the pre-entry active TB screening policy. Future immigrant TB policies should consider establishing active patient support strategies and a healthcare collaboration system between countries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11043236PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44197-023-00181-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

policy implementation
16
treatment outcomes
12
pre-entry tuberculosis
8
tuberculosis screening
8
immigrants treatment
8
south korea
8
difference-in-differences analysis
8
policy
8
screening policy
8
immigrant patients
8

Similar Publications

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms offer an effective solution to alleviate the burden of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in public health settings. However, there are challenges in translating diagnostic performance and its application when deployed in real-world conditions.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the technical feasibility of integration and diagnostic performance of validated DR screening (DRS) AI algorithms in real-world outpatient public health settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

One in five adolescents (10-19) live in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the availability of policies targeted at this age group, policy formulation, implementation, and gains in adolescent health continue to be underwhelming. Actors or stakeholders are architects of policy, bringing their ideological values, interests, power, and positions to policy formulation and implementation and thus influencing the policy process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Informal caregivers of home-dwelling people with dementia experience significant unmet needs. However, family physician teams as primary health care gatekeepers for aging populations in China remain an underused resource for structured caregiver support.

Objective: This hybrid effectiveness-implementation study aimed to evaluate a policy-aligned integration of the World Health Organization's iSupport web-based program with China's family physician contract services for informal dementia caregivers while systematically assessing implementation determinants using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systematic review of pro-equity strategies to improve vaccination among priority populations.

Vaccine

September 2025

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address:

Background/objectives: The importance of pro-equity strategies in addressing disadvantages that people and communities face due to their gender, migration status, ethnicity, disability, and place of residence is increasingly being recognised, but analysis of empirical evidence on how they improve vaccination in these priority groups is limited. This systematic review aims to fill this gap.

Methods: Standard evidence synthesis methods were employed, with searches conducted in four major bibliographic databases in March 2025.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF