98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: International guidelines on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) recommend a formal oncological resection including splenectomy when distal pancreatectomy is indicated. This study aimed to compare oncological and surgical outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy in patients with presumed IPMN.
Methods: An international, retrospective cohort study was undertaken in 14 high-volume centres from 7 countries including consecutive patients after distal pancreatectomy for IPMN (2005-2019). Patients were divided into spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS). The primary outcome was lymph node metastasis (LNM). Secondary outcomes were overall survival, duration of operation, blood loss, and secondary splenectomy.
Results: Overall, 700 patients were included after distal pancreatectomy for IPMN; 123 underwent SPDP (17.6%) and 577 DPS (82.4%). The rate of malignancy was 29.6% (137 patients) and the overall rate of LNM 6.7% (47 patients). Patients with preoperative suspicion of malignancy had a LNM rate of 17.2% (23 of 134) versus 4.3% (23 of 539) among patients without suspected malignancy (P < 0.001). Overall, SPDP was associated with a shorter operating time (median 180 versus 226 min; P = 0.001), less blood loss (100 versus 336 ml; P = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (5 versus 8 days; P < 0.001). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between SPDP and DPS for IPMN after correction for prognostic factors (HR 0.50, 95% c.i. 0.22 to 1.18; P = 0.504).
Conclusion: This international cohort study found LNM in 6.7% of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for IPMN. In patients without preoperative suspicion of malignancy, SPDP seemed oncologically safe and was associated with improved short-term outcomes compared with DPS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10776207 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad424 | DOI Listing |
Surgery
September 2025
Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heide
Introduction: Very early recurrence in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has been defined as recurrence ≤3 months after resection. Besides others, neoadjuvant treatment is delivered based on the assumption of preoperative eradication of micrometastasis as well as local downstaging. Prognostic factors of very early recurrence after neoadjuvant treatment remain largely unexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is a highly aggressive tumor with a high mortality rate. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, has gained popularity, although the evidence of its efficacy is limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChirurgie (Heidelb)
September 2025
Klinik für Visceral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland.
Background/ Aim: Total pancreatectomy (TP) is an uncommon type of pancreatic resection, even at high-volume centers. The indications of a TP are not fully defined, and the outcomes are controversial. The study aims to assess the frequency of use, indications, and early outcomes of TP in a contemporary consecutive series of 36 patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Toranomon, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Background: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) enables posterior dissection along Gerota's fascia, contributing to improved R0 resection rates, lymphadenectomy, and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic body and tail cancers. Although a posterior margin ≥ 1000 μm has been associated with better prognosis, its relative impact compared with Gerota's fascia resection remains unclear. This study evaluated whether securing a posterior margin ≥ 1000 μm improves outcomes in patients undergoing Gerota's fascia resection for pancreatic body and tail cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF