98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Patients receiving dialysis access surgery are often exposed to adverse social determinants of health (SDH) that negatively impact their care. Our goal was to characterize these factors experienced by our arteriovenous dialysis access patients and identify differences in health outcomes based on their SDH.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent dialysis access creation (2017-2021) and were screened for SDH at a clinical visit (using THRIVE survey) implemented at an urban, safety-net hospital institution within 1 year of access creation. Demographics, procedural details, early postoperative outcomes, survey responses, and referral to our hospital's preventive food pantry were recorded. Univariable analysis and multivariable analyses were performed to assess for associations with key health outcomes.
Results: There were 190 patients who responded to the survey within 1 year of their operation. At least 1 adverse SDH was identified in 42 (22%) patients. Normalized to number of respondents for each question, adverse SDH identified were difficulty obtaining transportation to medical appointments (18%), food insecurity (16%), difficulty affording utilities (13%), difficulty affording medication (12%), unemployed and seeking employment (9%), unstable housing (7%), difficulty caring for family/friends (6%), and desiring more education (5%). There were 71 (37%) patients who received food pantry referrals. Mean age was 60 years and 38% of patients were female and 64% were Black. More than half of patients (57%) had a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) at the time of access creation. Dialysis accesses created were brachiocephalic (39%), brachiobasilic (25%), radiocephalic fistulas (16%), and arteriovenous grafts (14%). Thirty-day emergency department (ED) visits, 30-day readmissions, and 90-day mortality occurred in 23%, 21%, and 2%, respectively. On univariable and multivariable analyses, any adverse SDH determined on survey and food pantry referral were not associated with preoperative dialysis through TDCs, receiving nonautogenous dialysis access, 30-day ED visits and readmissions, or 90-day mortality.
Conclusion: Nearly a quarter of dialysis access surgery patients at a safety-net hospital experienced adverse SDH and more than one-third received a food pantry referral. Most common difficulties experienced include difficulty obtaining transportation to medical appointments, food insecurity, and difficulty paying for utilities and medication. Although there were no differences in postoperative outcomes, the high prevalence of these adverse SDH warrants prioritization of resources in this population to ensure healthy equity and further investigation into their effects on health outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.026 | DOI Listing |
J Vasc Access
September 2025
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Purpose: Although stent grafts have demonstrated significant benefits over bare metal stents and conventional venoplasty at maintaining patency of dialysis vascular access, they are far from perfect and are prone to edge stenosis. A new strategy of placing stent graft to reduce the possible occurrence of edge stenosis is therefore proposed in this study.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective review between 2015 and 2023 identified 21 arteriovenous grafts (AVG) hemodialysis patients who underwent stent graft placement with the medial stent end in an outflow venous valve.
Ann Vasc Surg
September 2025
Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address:
Objectives: As a two-dimensional modality, venography has limitations in its capacity to measure lumen caliber and to assess stenotic disease accurately. This has implications in the management of end-stage renal-disease (ESRD) patients "no-option" candidates access for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) creation secondary to high risk of vascular access failure. The incremental diagnostic and clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was quantified in this tunneled dialysis catheter dependent ESRD cohort.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Vasc Surg
September 2025
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA. Electronic address:
Objective: Upper-extremity arteriovenous (AV) access often requires re-intervention. However, the frequency of re-interventions and subsequent access failure is not well-characterized. Our goal was to evaluate the frequency and type of re-interventions, risk-factors, and outcomes after AV access creation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Importance: Predialysis nephrology care is associated with the likelihood of having a mature, usable arteriovenous access for starting hemodialysis (ie, incident vascular access), a key care quality metric for patients with kidney failure. However, the magnitude of this association has not been quantified to date.
Objective: To quantify the attributable association between lack of access to predialysis nephrology care and incident vascular access outcomes among Hispanic patients.