Evaluating the effect of Conversation Cards on agenda-setting in annual diabetes status visits: A multi-method study.

Objective: To evaluate Conversation Cards for shared agenda-setting between patients and nurses in status visits for type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Non-randomized comparison of survey responses between intervention and control groups. Content analysis of interview data of patient experiences from a purposive sample of the intervention group.

Results: The survey included 52 patients in the intervention and 55 in the control group. Survey data showed no significant differences between the groups. Regardless of the intervention, patients experienced that topics relevant to them were addressed. One in four patients rated the Conversation Cards as very supportive. Interview data indicated that the Conversation Cards added structure, commitment to the conversation, and support to raise topics not previously considered diabetes related.

Conclusion: Topics of concern were addressed in both intervention and control groups. The Conversation Cards for agenda-setting clarified a mutually agreed structure of the conversation, eased raising hitherto ignored topics, and increased engagement.

Practice Implications: The Conversation Cards have potential to improve shared agenda-setting, but implementation requires efforts from both parties. Patients are expected to consider their concerns and take an active part in agenda-setting. Nurses are expected to collaborate with the patient in the agenda-setting, which might challenge the nurses' habitual practice.