98%
921
2 minutes
20
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major infectious complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis dramatically reduces the incidence of early clinically significant CMV (csCMV) infection, it remains unclear whether it has a beneficial effect on nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we evaluated the impact of LMV prophylaxis on posttransplant outcomes using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Adult patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed (n = 6004). LMV prophylaxis was administered to 1640 patients (LMV group) and it significantly reduced the incidence of csCMV infection compared with those not administered LMV prophylaxis (15.4% vs 54.1%; p < 0.01). However, it did not improve the 1-year NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.40) and OS (HR, 0.96; p = 0.49). In the LMV group, 74 patients had breakthrough csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 3.44; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.93; p = 0.02) compared with those without infection. After completing LMV prophylaxis, 252 patients had late csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 1.83; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.58; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that managing breakthrough and late csCMV infections is important for improving long-term outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05474-1 | DOI Listing |
Transpl Infect Dis
July 2025
Microbiology Service, University Clinical Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Background: Letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis currently represents the first-line strategy for preventing clinically significant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (CsCMVi) in CMV-seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). A wide variety of CMV DNA thresholds for LMV interruption and preemptive antiviral therapy (PET) inception are in place across transplantation centers.
Methods: We evaluated the potential of CMV DNA doubling time (dt) in plasma to distinguish between CsCMVi and abortive CMV infection in allo-HSCT recipients on primary LMV prophylaxis.
Expert Rev Hematol
July 2025
Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Background: Introduction of letermovir (LMV) as prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has decreased the number of clinically significant CMV infections (cs-CMVi) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. However, long-term, real-world data on LMV's impact on post-transplant outcome remain scarce.
Research Design And Methods: The aim of our study was to evaluate clinical outcome of 93 CMV-seropositive patients who received LMV prophylaxis and to compare them to 168 LMV-free recipients.
Blood Cancer J
October 2024
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis
September 2024
Hematology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and in patients receiving novel hematological therapies. Its impact on morbidity and mortality necessitates effective management strategies. Despite recent advances in diagnostics and treatment, unresolved questions persist regarding monitoring and treatment, prompting the need for updated recommendations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEmergence of drug resistance is rare after use of letermovir (LMV) as prophylaxis for post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. In a recent study involving renal transplant recipients, no known LMV resistance mutations were detected in those receiving LMV prophylaxis. However, uncharacterized viral amino acid substitutions were detected in LMV recipients by deep sequencing in viral subpopulations of 5%-7%, at codons previously associated with drug resistance: UL56 S229Y (n = 1), UL56 M329I (n = 9) and UL89 D344Y (n = 5).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF