A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies with different nuchal translucency cutoffs. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficiency of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in cases with different cutoffs of nuchal translucency (NT).

Methods: The study retrospectively analyses pregnancies with NT ≥ 2.5 mm who underwent NIPT. Results of NT, NIPT, chromosomal diagnostic and pregnancy outcomes were collected.

Results: Study group was composed of 1470 single pregnancies, including 864 with NT 2.5-2.9 mm, 350 with NT 3.0-3.4 mm and 256 with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Non-significant differences were found in the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT between different cutoffs of NT. There was one false positive case with NT 4.3 mm, screening for 47,XYY in NIPT showed normal in diagnostic testing. For cases with normal NIPT results, the residual risk is 1:20 (5%, 95%CI: 0.1-10.1%) in fetuses with NT 3.0-3.4 mm and 1:15 (6.5%, 95%CI: 1.4%-11.5%) in fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. These false negative cases included one trisomy 21, seven pathogenic CNVs, one uniparental disomy and one single gene disorders.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that the PPV of NIPT for screening chromosomal aberrations were similarly in different NT cutoffs, while false positive case does exist. After normal in NIPT, risk for chromosomal aberrations remained, especially pathogenic CNV and even common trisomy. Therefore, prenatal diagnosis was recommended and CMA was suggested to apply in pregnancies with NT ≥ 3.0 mm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10613380PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-023-00661-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chromosomal aberrations
12
non-invasive prenatal
8
prenatal testing
8
screening chromosomal
8
nuchal translucency
8
nipt
8
ppv nipt
8
cutoffs false
8
false positive
8
positive case
8

Similar Publications