Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The study aimed to assess differences in the biological age () of 13-year-old swimmers and show their ability, as biologically younger- or older-, to develop fast 60-s oxygen uptake () kinetics and tethered swimming strength. Furthermore, the interplay between swimming strength, , and 400-m front crawl race performance was examined. The study involved 36 competitive young male swimmers (metrical age: 12.9 ± 0.56 years). Depending on examination, the group was divided into (: 15.8 ± 1.18 years, = 13) and (: 12.9 ± 0.60 years, = 23) participants, especially for the purpose of comparing tethered swimming indices, i.e., average values of force ( ) and (breath-by-breath analysis) kinetic indices, measured simultaneously in 1-min tethered front crawl swimming. From the 400-m racing stroke rate, stroke length kinematics was retrieved. In the 1-min tethered front crawl test, swimmers obtained higher results of absolute values of and . Conversely, when was present relatively to body mass and pulling force (in ml∙min∙kg∙N), swimmers showed higher relative usage. swimmers generally exhibited a slower increase in during the first 30 s of 60 s. , , , and basic swimming kinematic stroke length were significantly interrelated and influenced 400-m swimming performance. The 1-min tethered swimming test revealed significant differences in the homogeneous calendar age/heterogeneous group of swimmers. These were distinguished by the higher level of kinetics and pulling force in individuals and lower efficiency per unit of body mass per unit of force aerobic system in peers. The higher kinetics and tethered swimming force were further translated into 400-m front crawl speed and stroke length kinematics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587410PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1229007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

front crawl
20
tethered swimming
16
pulling force
12
400-m front
12
1-min tethered
12
stroke length
12
oxygen uptake
8
uptake kinetics
8
biological age
8
kinetics tethered
8

Similar Publications

Body roll during front crawl swimming refers to spinal rotation along the longitudinal axis. It is typically evaluated at the shoulders and pelvis; however, the middle and lower thoracic and lumbar spine are overlooked. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the differences in rotation angles and peak timing across the upper (shoulder roll), middle and lower thoracic spine, lumbar spine, and pelvis (hip roll) during front crawl swimming.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Inferring Nonlinear Dynamics of Cell Migration.

PRX Life

December 2024

William H. Miller III Department of Physics & Astronomy and Thomas C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.

The motility of eukaryotic cells is strongly influenced by their environment, with confined cells often developing qualitatively different motility patterns from those migrating on simple two-dimensional substrates. Recent experiments, coupled with data-driven methods to extract a cell's equation of motion, showed that cancerous MDA-MB-231 cells persistently hop in a limit cycle when placed on two-state adhesive micropatterns (two large squares connected by a narrow bridge), while they remain stationary on average in rectangular confinements. In contrast, healthy MCF10A cells migrating on the two-state micropattern are bistable, i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Learning the front crawl by observation: Comparing self- and other-models.

Hum Mov Sci

August 2025

InnoSportLab de Tongelreep, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address:

Background: Observational learning is widely used in skill learning, with self-modeling (i.e., viewing oneself perform at a higher level than currently possessed) emerging as a promising method with potential direct effects through attention/information processes, as well as indirect motivational benefits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Rotation of the trunk about its long axis or 'body roll' is essential for maximising front crawl swimming performance yet research on how physical impairment affects body roll is extremely limited. This study quantifies body roll kinematics in swimmers with and without central motor and neuromuscular impairments (CMNI). It was hypothesised that body roll kinematics differ between CMNI and non-disabled swimmers, are associated with sport class (level of impairment) and are influenced by upper and lower-limb functional levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: The aim of this study was to indicate which variables are the most important determinants of swimming results in the 50 m front crawl among non-elite pre-pubertal female swimmers. : The study group consisted of 14 female swimmers (at the time of the research commencement-biological age: 10.52 ± 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF