Deciphering the contextual barriers to mainstreaming the implementation of stroke thrombolysis in a Ghanaian hospital: Findings from the activate mixed-methods study.

Background: Each year, stroke-related death and disability claim over 143 million years of healthy life globally. Despite accounting for much of the global stroke burden, acute stroke care in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries remains suboptimal. Thrombolysis, an effective treatment option for stroke, is only received by a minority of stroke patients in these settings.

Aim: To determine the context-specific barriers and facilitators for the implementation of mainstream stroke thrombolysis in a Ghanaian hospital.

Methods: We employed a mixed-methods approach involving key stakeholders (recipients, providers, and leaders) in the acute stroke care continuum. Surveys were administered to acute stroke patients, and in-depth key informant interviews were conducted with experts in stroke care, including a neurologist, medical director, neurology residents, a stroke nurse, emergency physicians, a radiologist, and a pharmacist. The data collected from these interviews were transcribed and analysed using content analysis with the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) model as a guiding template. Two independent coders were involved in the analysis process to ensure reliability and accuracy.

Results: The stroke thrombolysis rate over a 6-month period was 0.83% (2 out of 242), with an average door-to-needle time among thrombolyzed patients being 2 hours, 37 minutes. Only 12.8% of patients (31 out of 242) presented within 4.5 hours of stroke symptom onset. The most significant obstacle to the implementation of acute stroke thrombolysis was related to the characteristics of the individuals involved, notably delays in presenting to the hospital among stroke patients due to a lack of knowledge about stroke symptoms and cultural beliefs. Additionally, a significant bottleneck that contributed to the discrepancy between the number of patients who presented within the 4.5-6 hour window and the number of patients who actually received thrombolysis was the inability to pay for the cost of thrombolytic agents. This was followed by challenges in the implementation processes.

Conclusions: Addressing challenges related to stroke awareness, and financial constraints via multi-level stakeholder engagement, and enactment of stroke protocols are crucial steps in ensuring a successful implementation of a stroke thrombolysis program in a resource-limited setting.