Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Although opioids have been shown to be effective for cancer pain, opioid-induced adverse events (AEs) are common. To date, little is known about the differences in risks of AEs by opioid type. This study was performed to compare the prevalence of AEs across opioids commonly used for analgesic treatment in Japan.

Methods: This study was conducted as a preplanned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective longitudinal study of inpatients with cancer pain who received specialized palliative care for cancer pain relief. We assessed daily AEs until termination of follow-up. We rated the severity of AEs based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. We computed adjusted odds ratios for each AE (constipation, nausea and vomiting, delirium, and drowsiness) with the following variables: opioid, age, sex, renal dysfunction, and primary cancer site.

Results: In total, 465 patients were analyzed. Based on the descriptive analysis, the top four most commonly used opioids were included in the analysis: oxycodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, and tramadol. With respect to the prevalence of AEs among all analyzed patients, delirium (n = 25, 6.3%) was the most frequent, followed by drowsiness (n = 21, 5.3%), nausea and vomiting (n = 19, 4.8%), and constipation (n = 28, 4.6%). The multivariate logistic analysis showed that no single opioid was identified as a statistically significant independent predictor of any AE.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of AEs among oxycodone, fentanyl, hydromorphone, and tramadol, which are commonly used for analgesic treatment in Japan.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579154PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08099-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse events
12
commonly analgesic
12
analgesic treatment
12
cancer pain
12
prevalence aes
12
opioid-induced adverse
8
opioids commonly
8
treatment japan
8
multicenter prospective
8
prospective longitudinal
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore contributing factors identified in serious incident investigations conducted by internal, independent multidisciplinary teams.

Methods: A total of 166 serious incident investigation reports, conducted between 2018 and 2023 in 11 integrated social and health care organizations in Finland, were analyzed. The reports were classified by incident type and contributing factor, which were analyzed using the WHO's Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Omeprazole, a widely used proton pump inhibitor, has been associated with rare but serious adverse events such as myopathy. Previous research suggests that concurrent use of omeprazole with fluconazole, a potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19/3A4 inhibitor, may increase the risk of myopathy. However, the contribution of genetic polymorphisms in CYP enzymes remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a simple, non-invasive measure of insulin resistance. In this exploratory analysis of FINEARTS-HF, we evaluated whether lower eGDR, reflecting greater insulin resistance, is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF).

Methods And Results: The eGDR was calculated at baseline using waist circumference, glycated haemoglobin, and hypertension status.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been proposed as an opioid-sparing adjunct after spinal fusion, but its efficacy across age groups is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42024531252). Twelve studies (RCTs and cohorts; n=1,644) were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Combining two advanced therapies may improve outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) refractory to monotherapy. We conducted a descriptive case series of 27 patients with CD who initiated combination therapy with upadacitinib and infliximab (n = 1), risankizumab (n = 17), ustekinumab (n = 3) or vedolizumab (n = 6). At 12 weeks, 24 achieved clinical response and 9 achieved steroid-free remission.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF