Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Systematic review. The purpose of this study was to compare the top 25 articles on pediatric spine surgery by number of citations and Altmetric score. All published articles pertaining to pediatric spine surgery from 2010 to 2021 were assessed for: Altmetric scores, Altmetric score breakdown (e.g. Twitter, News), citation counts, and article topics. The top 25 Altmetric articles and top 25 cited articles were identified. Out of the 50 total articles, only 3 (6.0%) overlapped between the two groups. The top Altmetric articles had averages (mean ± SD) of 167 ± 130 Altmetric score and 66 ± 135 citations, while the top citation articles had averages of 22 ± 45 Altmetric score and 196 ± 114 citations. When evaluating article topics, articles on 'back pain' (36% vs. 4%; P  = 0.003) and 'backpacks' (16% vs. 0%; P  = 0.030) were published significantly more in the top Altmetric group, while articles on 'scoliosis' (93% vs. 36%; P  < 0.001) and 'growth friendly surgery' (24% vs. 4%; P  = 0.041) were published significantly more in the top citation group. The total number of citations and online mentions for both groups are presented in Table 2. The biggest differences were the top Altmetric score articles receiving greater percentages of Twitter mentions relative to overall mentions (87% vs. 57%). The most socially popular articles focused on back pain and backpacks, and the most cited articles focused on scoliosis and growth-friendly surgery. Twitter had the most mentions of all social media for both the top cited articles and the top Altmetric articles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001132DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

altmetric score
16
pediatric spine
12
top altmetric
12
articles
10
spine surgery
8
altmetric
8
article topics
8
altmetric articles
8
articles averages
8
top
7

Similar Publications

Study on the impact and attention of cover papers for PLOS journals: Evidence from propensity score matching.

PLoS One

August 2025

Department of Big Data in Health Science, and Center for Clinical Big Data and Statistics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Background: Studies on the impact and attention of cover papers within open-access journals from the same publisher remain lacking. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of being featured as a cover paper on the impact and attention of papers for PLOS journals using propensity score matching (PSM).

Methods: Cover and non-cover papers published in five PLOS journals (i,e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Instagram and Traumatic Spine Injury: An Analysis of Social Media Altmetrics.

Asian J Neurosurg

September 2025

Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Objective: With social media's increasing prevalence, platforms like Instagram have emerged as key sources of altmetrics. This study aimed to analyze the posts shared on Instagram referencing traumatic spine injury in terms of account type, languages, geographical distribution, content analysis, and audience engagement.

Materials And Methods: Public Instagram posts were isolated and evaluated using the hashtags "#spinetrauma," "#spinefracture," "#spinetraumasurgeries," "#spinalcordinjuryrecovery," "#spinetraumasurvivor," and "#spinalcordinjury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This educational article explores the utility of bibliometrics and altmetrics in evaluating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) research. We introduce the concept of bibliometrics and altmetrics, provide an overview of the opportunities and challenges in using these analytical techniques, and highlight their future potential in TCIM research. Bibliometrics, based on publication and citation information, offer insights into TCIM research activity, output, scholarly influence, field structure, and collaboration practices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The digital revolution has transformed the landscape of scientific communication, offering new tools for the dissemination and uptake of research. In cardiology, a field defined by rapid innovation and large-scale data generation, social media platforms have emerged as powerful adjuncts to traditional publishing methods. Platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and LinkedIn are increasingly used by journals, academic institutions, and individual clinicians to share research, engage in discourse, and promote knowledge translation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF