Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
This educational article explores the utility of bibliometrics and altmetrics in evaluating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) research. We introduce the concept of bibliometrics and altmetrics, provide an overview of the opportunities and challenges in using these analytical techniques, and highlight their future potential in TCIM research. Bibliometrics, based on publication and citation information, offer insights into TCIM research activity, output, scholarly influence, field structure, and collaboration practices. Altmetrics, including social media mentions, downloads, and online bookmarks, can capture the broader societal engagement with TCIM research beyond traditional academic circles. We discuss challenges and opportunities in utilizing these metrics effectively, such as addressing biases, incorporating cultural nuances, and exploring emerging trends. Additionally, we issue a call to action for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to collaborate and leverage bibliometric and altmetric data to advance evidence-based healthcare practices to promote integrative approaches to health and wellness. By embracing a multidimensional approach to research evaluation, stakeholders can harness the potential of bibliometrics and altmetrics to improve TCIM research and healthcare delivery worldwide.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303004 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2025.101181 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Study on the impact and attention of cover papers for PLOS journals: Evidence from propensity score matching.
PLoS One
August 2025
Department of Big Data in Health Science, and Center for Clinical Big Data and Statistics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Background: Studies on the impact and attention of cover papers within open-access journals from the same publisher remain lacking. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of being featured as a cover paper on the impact and attention of papers for PLOS journals using propensity score matching (PSM).
Methods: Cover and non-cover papers published in five PLOS journals (i,e.
Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.
Integr Med Res
September 2025
Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
This educational article explores the utility of bibliometrics and altmetrics in evaluating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) research. We introduce the concept of bibliometrics and altmetrics, provide an overview of the opportunities and challenges in using these analytical techniques, and highlight their future potential in TCIM research. Bibliometrics, based on publication and citation information, offer insights into TCIM research activity, output, scholarly influence, field structure, and collaboration practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAcademic and societal impact of cancer pain research: a bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis.
Pain Manag
July 2025
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Başakşehir çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Background: Cancer-related pain affects quality of life despite advancements in management. Bibliometric and altmetric analyses provide insights into the academic and societal impact of research.
Objective: This study analyzed the top 100 most-cited articles on cancer-related pain using bibliometric and altmetric indicators, exploring correlations between altmetric scores, citations per year, and total citations.
Introduction: Clinical and Translational Science trainees are motivated to publish influential research. However, the extent to which this work gains influence with the public is largely unknown.
Methods: The authors identified over 30,000 publications that received KL2 or TL1 grant support through a Clinical and Translational Science Awards hub, from 2006 through January 2024.
Social Media Mentions are a Stronger Predictor of Citations than 5-Year Impact Factor in Neurosurgical Research.
Neurosurgery
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Background And Objectives: X (formerly known as Twitter) is a social media platform gaining popularity in neurosurgery. Other disciplines have demonstrated a positive correlation between Twitter activity and traditional citation metrics. This study aims to determine if X activity is a greater predictor of citation rates than a journal's 5-year impact factor (IF) among major neurosurgical journals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF