Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Children continue to experience harm when undergoing clinical procedures despite increased evidence of the need to improve the provision of child-centred care. The international ISupport collaboration aimed to develop standards to outline and explain good procedural practice and the rights of children within the context of a clinical procedure. The rights-based standards for children undergoing tests, treatments, investigations, examinations and interventions were developed using an iterative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder consensus building approach. This consensus approach used a range of online and face to face methods across three phases to ensure ongoing engagement with multiple stakeholders. The views and perspectives of 203 children and young people, 78 parents and 418 multi-disciplinary professionals gathered over a two year period (2020-2022) informed the development of international rights-based standards for the care of children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions. The standards are the first to reach international multi-stakeholder consensus on definitions of supportive and restraining holds.    Conclusion: This is the first study of its kind which outlines international rights-based procedural care standards from multi-stakeholder perspectives. The standards offer health professionals and educators clear evidence-based tools to support discussions and practice changes to challenge prevailing assumptions about holding or restraining children and instead encourage a focus on the interests and rights of the child. What is Known: • Children continue to experience short and long-term harm when undergoing clinical procedures despite increased evidence of the need to improve the provision of child-centred care. • Professionals report uncertainty and tensions in applying evidence-based practice to children's procedural care. What is New: • This is the first study of its kind which has developed international rights-based procedural care standards from multi-stakeholder perspectives. • The standards are the first to reach international multi-stakeholder consensus on definitions of supportive and restraining holds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10587267PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05131-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rights-based standards
12
tests treatments
12
examinations interventions
12
multi-stakeholder consensus
12
international rights-based
12
procedural care
12
standards
9
children
8
standards children
8
children tests
8

Similar Publications

In the 30 years since the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, there is no clear consensus on how to best measure population-level contraceptive use and family planning program impact. Widely used metrics have evolved relatively slowly, and some have run counter to a rights-based and person-centered approach that emphasizes individuals' self-identified contraceptive preferences. In this report, we describe the utilization of an understudied family planning measure-women's expressed intent to use (ITU) contraceptives within the next year-and explore its implications for population-level standardized comparisons and family planning programs using the Performance Monitoring for Action program data in 10 low- and middle-income geographies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) have evolved significantly since the early 20th century, driven by biomedical advances and profound socio-cultural shifts worldwide, particularly in Spain. This expansion has enabled access to parenthood in previously inaccessible situations, such as infertility and diverse family structures, yet it also poses risks of human rights violations.

Materials And Methods: A reflective analysis is conducted on the practices in Spanish healthcare related to assisted reproduction, based on national legislation and its alignment with international human rights legislation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BackgroundOccupational health and safety (OHS) is a vital dimension of labor policy, yet its presence in political discourse, particularly in party manifestos, remains underexplored. In democratic systems, election manifestos reflect the political will and priorities of parties, including their commitment to workers' welfare and workplace safety.ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate how political parties in Turkey addressed OHS in their 2023 general election manifestos.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is effective for weight loss but may exacerbate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in predisposed patients. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate whether adding cruroplasty to LSG (Cr-LSG) improves postoperative GERD symptom control in patients with intraoperative evidence of hiatal laxity.

Methods: A total of 100 patients undergoing LSG were randomized to either standard LSG or LSG with posterior cruroplasty (Cr-LSG).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Surrogacy remains one of the most contentious topics in contemporary reproductive law, sparking intense debate across legal, ethical, and social spheres. In Italy, the recent introduction of universal criminal jurisdiction has considerably tightened the regulatory framework, extending criminal liability to acts committed abroad by Italian citizens. This legislative development raises significant concerns, particularly in relation to the principles of legality, proportionality, and harm, as well as its implications for safeguarding the best interests of the child.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF