98%
921
2 minutes
20
Home advantage and referee bias are two sport factors that have been widely studied in the football (i.e., soccer) context. However, the mediating effect of spectators on these factors is not well understood, especially in the Turkish Super League. We examined (a) how variables of home advantage, referee bias, and spectator presence interacted to affect the outcome of past football matches; (b) how these variables have changed over time in the Turkish Super League; (c) and whether home advantage and referee bias differ in matches with spectators and ghost matches (without spectators). We analyzed regular season matches played in the Turkish Super League between the 2014-2015 and 2021-2022 seasons. We found that home teams had a significant advantage over away teams in matches with spectators ( < .001) and in ghost matches ( < .05 and < .001), with small to medium effect sizes ( = .09 and .34, respectively). Regarding referee bias, away teams received more yellow cards and fewer penalties than home teams in matches with spectators ( < .001; = -.10), and away teams received fewer yellow cards than home teams in ghost matches ( > .05; = .05). There was no statistically significant difference between home and away teams on number of red cards in either type of match ( > .05). Thus, our data reveal that home teams have an edge over away teams with and without spectators, but this advantage is reduced during ghost matches (without spectators). We also revealed weak evidence of referee bias in favor of home teams, but only for some variables and only when spectators were present.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00315125231191683 | DOI Listing |
Psychol Sport Exerc
November 2025
Department of Economics & Business, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Decision-making in high-pressure environments is a complex process influenced by individual characteristics and hierarchical dynamics. In football, the introduction of the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) was intended to improve decision accuracy. However, VAR decisions involve human judgment and interaction between the VAR and the on-field referee.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil
July 2025
China Football College, Beijing Sport University, No.48 Xinxi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Objectives: Video-based decision-making training is considered a promising intervention to enhance the decision-making skills of football referees. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the effectiveness of video-based training and evaluate its overall impact on improving referees' decision-making skills, providing a scientific basis for the optimization and innovation of referee training methods.
Method: A systematic search was performed across four electronic databases (EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science).
Psychol Sport Exerc
September 2025
Department of Statistics, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Türkiye. Electronic address:
Video Assistant Referee (VAR) is a technology that has been used in various national and international organizations since 2018 to minimize the effect of critical decisions made by referees during the match on outcome of the game. The main purpose of this system is to ensure justice, and this study aims to investigate the effect of VAR in matches played between strong teams and weak teams. For this purpose, the data of a total of 3329 matches (pre-VAR, 4 seasons and 1224 matches and after-VAR, 6 seasons, 2105 matches) played in the Turkish Super League, where the teams called the Big 4 are in a very strong position (economic, media, number of fans, etc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Med Footb
April 2025
Exeter Head Impact Brain Injury and Trauma, Public Health and Sports Sciences Department, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Detecting concussion during football games is difficult due to the complexity of the condition. Medical staff may only enter the field to assess players when the injury is recognised by the referee. With no temporary concussion substitutions available, pitch-side testing often depends on medics recognising, or players self-reporting, symptoms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Med Footb
December 2024
Department of Health and Sports Sciences, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
This study explores whether referees are biased when awarding additional time in Association Football. We collected data on Awarded Additional Time (AAT) granted by the referees and Calculated Additional Time (CAT), representing the interruption time meant to be considered for additional time according to the rulebook. Analysis of Additional Time Error (ATE), given as the difference between CAT and AAT, in the second half of German football Bundesliga season 2022/2023, revealed that referees award less AAT than warranted by interruptions (ATE = 2:10 ± 2:24 min).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF