98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To evaluate the vertical misfit, stress distribution around dental implants, and cantilever fracture strength of 3-unit implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using frameworks made from different materials and manufacturing techniques.
Materials And Methods: Forty FPDs were fabricated and divided into 5 groups (n = 8) based on the framework material used: LAS Co-Cr (Conventional casting-laser welding); TIG Co-Cr (Conventional casting -TIG welding); OP Co-Cr (Conventional casting-one-piece); CAD Co-Cr (CAD-CAM); and CAD Zr (CAD-CAM ZrO). The vertical misfit was evaluated before porcelain application (T1) and before (T2), and after thermomechanical cycling (T3) by stereomicroscopy. Cantilever fracture strength was tested with a 50 kN (5000 kgf) load cell at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Qualitative and quantitative photoelastic analysis was performed to evaluate stress distribution at seven specific points in five FPDs (n = 1/group) subjected to occlusal loading.
Results: Only the molar showed interaction among the three factors (G × S × T; F = 1.630; p = 0.044). Thermomechanical cycling (T2 vs. T3) had a significant effect on intra-group vertical misfit in molar, especially in LAS Co-Cr (Δ = 5.87; p = 0.018) and OP Co-Cr (Δ = 5.39; p = 0.007), with no significant effect in premolar (p > 0.05). Ceramic application combined with thermomechanical cycling (T1 vs. T3) caused a significant intra-group increase in vertical misfit in all groups, both in the molar and premolar (p < 0.05). OP Co-Cr was associated with greater vertical misfit and stress concentration. Frameworks manufactured by the CAD-CAM system exhibited lower vertical misfit and better stress distribution. FPDs with metal frameworks (>410.83 ± 72.26 N) showed significantly higher fracture strength (p < 0.05) than zirconia (277.47 ± 39.10 N), and the first signs of ceramic veneering fracture were observed around 900 N.
Conclusions: FPDs with frameworks manufactured using a CAD-CAM system appear to be associated with lower vertical misfit and better stress distribution, although the section of the frameworks followed by welding may be a viable alternative. In addition, metal frameworks exhibit high fracture strength.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13739 | DOI Listing |
Dent J (Basel)
July 2025
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59, 40125 Bologna, Italy.
Severe jawbone atrophy, particularly in elderly or medically compromised patients, presents a significant challenge for conventional implant placement. In cases where bone augmentation is not feasible, alternative techniques-such as short, narrow, tilted, and zygomatic implants-may be indicated for the rehabilitation of the atrophic jaw. Subperiosteal implants have re-emerged as a further viable alternative, especially with recent advancements in digital planning and custom fabrication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Implants Res
July 2025
Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Objective: To assess the impact of horizontal intraoral scan bodies (H-ISBs) on the trueness of complete-arch digital impressions compared to vertical ISBs (V-ISBs). To evaluate trueness among four intraoral scanners (IOS) and inter-operator variability across different ISB × IOS combinations.
Materials And Methods: Digital impressions were made from a dental cast with four multi-unit analogs using four H-ISBs: H-NB, H-NS, H-M6, H-SF, and a V-ISB (V-EA) as a comparison.
J Appl Oral Sci
June 2025
Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Departamento de Materiais Dentários e Prótese, Araçatuba, SP, Brasil.
Objectives: This in vitro study evaluated implant-supported single crowns with external connections fabricated using different techniques (cast and CAD/CAM) and materials (metal-ceramic and translucent zirconia) regarding vertical and horizontal marginal fit and torque loss before and after mechanical cycling.
Methodology: A total of 50 specimens prepared using cast (lost wax) and CAD/CAM were divided into five groups-MC (metal-ceramic crowns), ZrB (Co-Cr base, coping milled in zirconia and feldspathic ceramic veneering), Zr (coping milled in zirconia and feldspathic ceramic veneering), MZrB (Co-Cr base and monolithic translucent zirconia crown), and MZr (monolithic translucent zirconia crown)-and subjected to 5×10⁶ mechanical cycles at a 30° angle at 37°C, and an applied load of 150N at 2Hz. All crowns were screwed with a 30Ncm torque.
BMC Oral Health
April 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St., Azarita, Alexandria, 21527, Egypt.
Background: To guarantee a passive fit, full arch implant supported prostheses require scrupulous impressions. The accuracy of conventional and digital impressions is still up for debate, despite several studies comparing both acquisition techniques. The present study aimed to compare mandibular full arch implant impressions by assessing the vertical misfit of implant supported frameworks obtained through conventional and digital impressions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Bucofacial Prostheses, Faculty of Odontology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the vertical misfit at the implant-abutment interface in external and internal connections across various implant brands, comparing original milled titanium abutments with laser-sintered cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) abutments.
Materials And Methods: A total of 160 implants from four different brands were utilized, with 80 featuring external connections (EC) and 80 internal connections (IC). Original milled titanium abutments (n = 160) and Co-Cr laser-sintered abutments (n = 160) were randomly attached to each connection type, following the manufacturer's recommended torque.