Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background/objective: The scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) is a feasible assessment for the classification and evaluation of therapeutic interventions. In order to provide access to the SARA in German, the aim of this work was to translate the SARA into German and to adapt it according to international guidelines for German-speaking countries.

Method: The process involved six steps. The comprehensibility of the scale was assessed using interviews with potential users.

Results: A total of nine physiotherapists and six physicians working in various clinical settings were interviewed, seven of them worked in Germany and four each in Austria and Switzerland. The interviews led to a refined version of the translation. The comprehensibility testing revealed no country-specific differences.

Conclusion: A German version of the SARA authorized by the co-author of the original publication, is now available. The results provide methodological insights into the translation process of observation-based standardized assessments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10959797PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01014-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assessment rating
8
rating ataxia
8
ataxia sara
8
sara german
8
sara
5
[scale assessment
4
sara translation
4
translation cultural
4
cultural adaptation
4
adaptation german-speaking
4

Similar Publications

Background: Chest radiography is often performed preoperatively as a common diagnostic tool. However, chest radiography carries the risk of radiation exposure. Given the uncertainty surrounding the utility of preoperative chest radiographs, physicians require systematically developed recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Early identification of pathological α-synuclein deposition (αSynD) may improve understanding of Lewy body disorder (LBD) progression and enable timely disease-modifying treatments.

Objectives: We investigated αSynD using a seed amplification assay and assessed prodromal LBD symptoms in individuals with idiopathic olfactory dysfunction (iOD).

Methods: In this cross-sectional, case-control study, we included iOD participants and normosmic healthy controls (HC) aged 55 to 75 years without diagnoses of dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson's disease (PD), or other major neurological disorders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.

Mov Disord Clin Pract

September 2025

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Background: The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is the most used outcome measure in clinical trials for cerebellar ataxias. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), a parameter used to assess meaningful change, is not clearly defined.

Objective: To help define MCID for SARA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mendelian randomization studies on cardiometabolic factors and intracranial aneurysms: A systematic literature analysis.

Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban

May 2025

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.

Objectives: Intracranial aneurysm (IA) has an insidious onset, and once ruptured, it carries high rates of mortality and disability. Cardiometabolic factors may be associated with the formation and rupture of IA. This study aims to summarize the application of Mendelian randomization (MR) methods in research on cardiometabolic factors and IA, providing insights for further elucidation of IA etiology and pathogenesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Preoperative anxiety is one of the leading causes of morbidity in the perioperative period. Quality of Recovery (QoR)is a recent and valid questionnaire to assess recovery process in this time.

Methods: Ninety patients were visited by an anaesthetist twice in the preoperative period, by either the same or a different anaesthetist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF