98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: The incidence of Wilms' tumor (WT) among adult individuals accounts for less than 1% of kidney cancer cases, with a prognosis usually less favorable when compared to younger individuals and an overall survival rate of 70% for the adult patients versus 90% for the pediatric cases. The diagnosis and treatment of WT are complex in the preoperative setting; neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or robotic surgery has rarely been described. This study aimed to review the literature of robotic surgery in WT and report the first adult WT management using both NAC and robotic strategy.
Methods: We reported a case of WT managed in a multidisciplinary setting. Furthermore, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, a systematic review of the literature until August 2020 of WT treated with a robotic approach was carried out.
Results: A 33-year-old female had a diagnosis of WT. She was scheduled to NAC, and according to the clinical and radiological response to a robotic radical nephrectomy with aortic lymph nodes dissection, she was managed with no intraoperative rupture, a favorable surgical outcome, and a follow-up of 25 months, which did not show any recurrence. The systematic review identified a total number of 230 cases of minimally invasive surgery reported in the literature for WT. Of these, approximately 15 patients were carried out using robotic surgery in adolescents while none in adults. Moreover, NAC has not been administered before minimally invasive surgery in adults up until now.
Conclusion: WT is a rare condition in adults with only a few cases treated with either NAC or minimally invasive approach so far. The advantage of NAC followed by the robotic approach could lead to favorable outcomes in this complex scenario. Notwithstanding, additional cases of adult WT need to be identified and investigated to improve the oncological outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10023547 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.10.004 | DOI Listing |
Int J Colorectal Dis
September 2025
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2ZD, Scotland, UK.
Background: The optimal management of synchronous rectal cancer (RC) and prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates treatment strategies and reports postoperative, oncological, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients treated with curative intent.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024598049).
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: The implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for perihilar (PHC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) remains limited and a systematic review including only comparative studies of MILS versus the open approach is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in patients with hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
Methods: Systematic review in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for original studies comparing at least five patients undergoing MILS with open liver surgery for PHC and IHC.
BMJ Open
September 2025
Department of Rehabilitation, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, Chinax
Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of proximal core training on biomechanical risk factors and strength parameters in individuals at high risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (specifically: those exhibiting pathological movement patterns, neuromuscular deficits or biomechanical risk factors) and compared direct versus indirect interventions. We hypothesised that targeted training enhances dynamic knee stabilisation and hip control during high-risk manoeuvres, with direct approaches providing superior biomechanical benefits through neuromuscular control optimisation.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Surgery
September 2025
Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Background: To compare the short-term outcomes of robotic abdominoperineal resection with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in patients with rectal cancer.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane through March 2024 following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO number: CRD42024520671). Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies comparing short-term outcomes between the 2 approaches were selected.
J Med Internet Res
September 2025
School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Background: Labor shortages in health care pose significant challenges to sustaining high-quality care for people with intellectual disabilities. Social robots show promise in supporting both people with intellectual disabilities and their health care professionals; yet, few are fully developed and embedded in productive care environments. Implementation of such technologies is inherently complex, requiring careful examination of facilitators and barriers influencing sustained use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF