98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The optimal timing of combined chemotherapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is undetermined.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).
Methods: Five hundred and thirty-eight patients diagnosed with LA-NPC and treated with NACT + RT or CCRT alone were enrolled in the study. Restricted cubic spline regression (RCS) was used to determine the relationship between age and the hazard Ratio of death. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) related to NACT + RT or CCRT alone. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for potential confounding factors.
Results: Compared with the CCRT alone regimen, the NACT + RT regimen showed a significantly better OS rate with a 62% decreased risk of death in a subgroup of patients aged ⩾ 45 years (hazard ratio, HR: 0.38; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.24-0.61). In patients aged < 45 years, the risk of death was significantly increased when NACT + RT was chosen compared with CCRT (HR: 4.10; 95% CI: 2.09-8.07).
Conclusions: Age is a significant biomarker when selecting NACT + RT or CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced NPC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CBM-210357 | DOI Listing |
Head Neck
September 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, Habib Bourguiba Hospital University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard of care for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), yet distant metastasis remains the predominant cause of treatment failure. Two phase III randomized trials have investigated the efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine following CCRT, with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of adjuvant capecitabine on survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in LA-NPC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAsian Pac J Cancer Prev
August 2025
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Penjaringan, North Jakarta, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.
Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared to CCRT alone in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and grey literature (Google Scholar, OpenGrey, WorldCat) up to April 26, 2024 (PROSPERO: [CRD42024540599]). Seven studies were included (stages IB2-IVA, FIGO 2018), involving 446 participants.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
April 2025
Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, El Qalybia, Cairo, Egypt.
Background: Since 1999, platinum based chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer patients, but the estimated increase in overall survival (OS) over a 5-year period was only 6% in patients treated with CRT versus radiotherapy alone.There have been no additional developments in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer(LACC) patients since CRT introduction and approximately 30-40% of those patients failed to achieve complete response to CRT. Therefore, alternative approaches are needed to improve the outcome for such patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Background/objectives: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy (NACT + CCRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy following CCRT (CCRT + ACT) have inconsistent effects on the survival of women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) compared to CCRT. Moreover, the effects of NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT have not been clearly compared. This study compared the effects of NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT on survival using a network meta-analysis to select the optimal treatment in women with LACC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF