Maxillary transverse deficiency diagnosed by 3 methods and its relationship with molar angulation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) diagnosed by 3 methods and molar angulation measured in 3-dimensions in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion, which could give reference to the selection of diagnostic methods in MTD patients.

Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography data of 65 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion (mean age 17.35 ± 4.45 years) were selected and imported into MIMICS software. Transverse deficiencies were evaluated by 3 methods, and molar angulations were measured after reconstructing 3-dimensional planes. Two examiners performed repeated measurements to assess the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability. Pearson correlation coefficient analyses and linear regressions were performed to determine the relationship between a transverse deficiency and molar angulations. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the diagnostic results of 3 methods.

Results: The novel molar angulation measurement method and 3 MTD diagnostic methods have the interexaminer and intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficient values >0.6. The transverse deficiency diagnosed by 3 methods was significantly and positively correlated with the sum of molar angulation. There was a statistically significant difference for the transverse deficiencies diagnosed by the 3 methods. The transverse deficiency was significantly higher in Boston University's analysis than in Yonsei's analysis.

Conclusions: Clinicians ought to choose the diagnostic methods properly, considering the feature of the 3 methods and the individual difference of each patient.