[Assessing radiological images: is twice always better?].

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, afd. Orthopedie, Leeuwarden.

Published: December 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

In current practice, radiological diagnostics are often assessed by both the referring clinician as well as the radiologist. Specific medical specialists like pulmonologists and orthopaedic surgeons make treatment decisions mostly on their own expertise and interpretation of radiological images, before the radiological report is available. For health care as a whole, a single assessment gives efficiency gains, and the radiologist is not disturbed by getting rid of 'bulk' and can focus on the more complex matter in which he or she is indispensable. Regular multidisciplinary meetings may serve to jointly assess images about which there is ambiguity. Combining clinical information and radiological expertise then leads to optimisation of both quality and efficiency. It makes sense and is efficient to have clinicians with specific radiological expertise, such as pulmonologists and orthopaedists, assess certain radiological examinations independently, allowing the radiologist to concentrate on more complex imaging.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiological images
8
radiological expertise
8
radiological
6
[assessing radiological
4
images better?]
4
better?] current
4
current practice
4
practice radiological
4
radiological diagnostics
4
diagnostics assessed
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Medical physicists play a critical role in ensuring image quality and patient safety, but their routine evaluations are limited in scope and frequency compared to the breadth of clinical imaging practices. An electronic radiologist feedback system can augment medical physics oversight for quality improvement. This work presents a novel quality feedback system integrated into the Epic electronic medical record (EMR) at a university hospital system, designed to facilitate feedback from radiologists to medical physicists and technologist leaders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The treatment of mandibular angle fractures remains controversial, particularly regarding the method of fixation. The primary aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes following treatment with 1-plate versus 2-plate fixation across two oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics. The secondary aim was to evaluate associations between patient-, trauma-, and procedure-specific factors with postoperative complications and to identify high-risk patients for secondary osteosynthesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of a customized deep learning model based on CNN and U-Net for detecting and segmenting the second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) of maxillary first molar teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

Methodology: CBCT scans of 37 patients were imported into 3D slicer software to crop and segment the canals of the mesiobuccal (MB) root of the maxillary first molar. The annotated data were divided into two groups: 80% for training and validation and 20% for testing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Thyroid nodules (TNs) are frequent and often benign. Accurately differentiating between benign and malignant nodules is crucial for proper management. This research aims to use ultrasonography to examine TNs and identify possible risk factors in order to improve patient outcomes and diagnostic accuracy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Use of artificial intelligence for classification of fractures around the elbow in adults according to the 2018 AO/OTA classification system.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

September 2025

Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyds Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 182 88, Sweden.

Background: This study evaluates the accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system, specifically a convolutional neural network (CNN), in classifying elbow fractures using the detailed 2018 AO/OTA fracture classification system.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 5,367 radiograph exams visualizing the elbow from adult patients (2002-2016) was conducted using a deep neural network. Radiographs were manually categorized according to the 2018 AO/OTA system by orthopedic surgeons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF