Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The phase 3 RATIONALE-303 trial (NCT03358875) investigated the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab versus docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Here, we report the efficacy and safety results and describe the exploratory biomarker analyses.

Methods: A total of 805 patients aged more than or equal to 18 years with locally advanced or metastatic squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized 2:1 to intravenous tislelizumab 200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m every 3 weeks. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor cell expression greater than or equal to 25% populations. The exploratory biomarker analyses included PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and gene expression profile.

Results: At the prespecified interim analysis (August 10, 2020), the co-primary end point of OS in the ITT population was met, with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS with tislelizumab versus docetaxel (median 17.2 versus 11.9 mo, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, p < 0.0001). At the final analysis (July 15, 2021), the other co-primary end point of OS in the PD-L1 tumor cell greater than or equal to 25% population was further met (median 19.3 versus 11.5 mo, respectively; HR = 0.53, p < 0.0001), and OS continued to improve in the ITT population (median 16.9 versus 11.9 mo, respectively, HR = 0.66). Exploratory biomarker analyses revealed the potential association of NOTCH1-4 mutations with improved tislelizumab efficacy for both OS and progression-free survival, whereas tissue tumor mutation burden correlated with progression-free survival benefit, but not OS benefit. No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusions: Tislelizumab was found to have a significantly improved and long-term clinical benefit in OS versus docetaxel in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2022.09.217DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus docetaxel
16
tislelizumab versus
12
advanced nsclc
12
exploratory biomarker
12
efficacy safety
8
docetaxel pretreated
8
pretreated patients
8
patients advanced
8
pd-l1 tumor
8
tumor cell
8

Similar Publications

Background: Standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (60-66 Gy) following surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has excellent oncological control but high treatment morbidity. We aimed to compare toxicity of a 30-36 Gy regimen of de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy and standard of care treatment.

Methods: We did this phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial in two academic sites in the USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of combining enzalutamide with docetaxel versus using docetaxel alone in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses after treatment with abiraterone followed by enzalutamide.

Methods: A retrospective analysis involved 67 mCRPC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University's Urology Department between October 2021 and August 2023. All experienced disease progression after treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and fluorouracil (5-FU) (i.e. TPF regimen) has yielded favourable outcomes in treating advanced external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma (EACSCC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The randomized GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme trial showed no significant improvement in overall survival with TPEx chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel-platinum-cetuximab) versus EXTREME regimen (platinum-fluorouracil-cetuximab) in first line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the TPEx regimen had a favorable safety profile, and could provide an alternative to standard of care with the EXTREME regimen in this setting. Our aim was to assess the cost-utility of the TPEx strategy versus EXTREME strategy in the French setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We report results of the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes from the phase III KEYNOTE-585 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03221426) study. Participants with previously untreated, locally advanced, resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer were enrolled into the main (n = 804) and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT; n = 203) cohorts, and randomly assigned 1:1 to neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF