98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: In patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke are dreaded complications. Predictive markers for these events are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictive value of microembolic signals (MES) for stroke, detected by Transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) in patients with HeartMate 3 (HM 3) or HeartWare (HW).
Methods: A thirty-minute bilateral TCD monitoring of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was performed in 62 outpatients with LVAD (HM 3 N = 31, HW N = 31) and 31 healthy controls. Prevalence and quantity of MES were investigated regarding clinical and laboratory parameters. Cerebrovascular events (CVE) were recorded on follow-up at 90 and 180 days.
Results: MES were detected in six patients with HM 3, three patients with HW, and three controls. Within the LVAD groups, patients on monotherapy with vitamin-K-antagonist (VKA) without antiplatelet therapy were at risk for a higher count of MES (negative binomial regression: VKA: 1; VKA + ASA: Exp(B) = 0.005, 95%CI 0.001-0.044; VKA + clopidogrel: Exp(B) = 0.012, 95%CI 0.002-0.056). There was no association between the presence of MES and CVE or death on follow-up (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: For the first time, the prevalence of MES was prospectively investigated in a notable outpatient cohort of patients with HM 3 and HW. Despite optimized properties of the latest LVAD, MES remain detectable depending on antithrombotic therapy. No association between MES and CVE could be detected.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14409 | DOI Listing |
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
September 2025
Division of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. Electronic address:
Objective: Our objective was to determine the long-term outcomes of concomitant tricuspid valve procedures (TVP) during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received HeartMate II or 3 from 2004 to 2023. Nine patients who had a previous TVP were excluded.
Am J Cardiol
August 2025
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hypertension, Rutgers University - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson Street, East Tower - 8th Floor, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States. Electronic address:
The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has increased in recent years as a destination therapy. The HeartMate 3 (HM3) is currently the only commercially available LVAD for implantation in the United States. Societal guidelines for multimodality cardiac imaging evaluation of LVADs and temporary mechanical support devices were recently published and serve as a comprehensive resource for the evaluation of LVAD patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J Case Rep
September 2025
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Background: Ventricular tachycardias (VTs) are a life-threatening complication of patients with end-stage left ventricular dysfunction, and are a frequent cause for considering advanced therapies. Their management in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) presents unique challenges, requiring a multidisciplinary approach to tailored strategies.
Case Summary: We present the case of a 70-year-old male with a history of VTs who underwent HeartMate 3 (Abbott, USA) implantation for advanced heart failure secondary to ischaemic cardiomyopathy and refractory VTs.
JACC Heart Fail
August 2025
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: The role of heart failure specific therapies in LVAD recipients is unclear and observational data suggest improved outcomes with neurohormonal blockers. ENVAD-HF evaluated safety and tolerability of the Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan, for managing blood pressure (BP) in HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD recipients versus standard of care (SOC).
Methods: ENVAD-HF was a prospective multicenter, randomized, open-label study of sacubitril/valsartan or SOC for managing BP (MAP goal 75-90 mmHg) in stable LVAD recipients with 12-month follow-up.
Biomedicines
July 2025
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tübingen University Hospital, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Background: In advanced heart failure patients implanted with a fully magnetically levitated HeartMate 3 (HM3) Abbott left ventricular assist device (LVAD), it is unknown how the role of the LVAD outpatient clinic may affect the long-term survival after hospital discharge. Our objective is to share our standardized protocol for outpatient care, to describe the role of the LVAD outpatient clinic in postoperative long-term care after LVAD implantation, and to report survival.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with HM3 LVAD in our institute between September 2015 and January 2025.