Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: People who experience marginalization, including Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus (ie, all other marginalized genders and sexual orientations) people (LGBTQ+) experience discrimination during healthcare interactions, which negatively impacts patient-provider communication and care. Yet, scarce research examines the lived experience of unfair treatment among patients from marginalized groups to guide patient-centered tools that improve healthcare equity.

Materials And Methods: We interviewed 25 BIPOC and/or LGBTQ+ people about their experiences of unfair treatment and discrimination when visiting healthcare providers. Through thematic analysis, we describe participants' immediate reactions and longer-term consequences of those experiences.

Results: We identified 4 ways that participants reacted to discrimination in the moment: Fighting, Fleeing, Excusing, and Working Around Bias. Long-term consequences reflect 6 ways they coped: Delaying or Avoiding Care, Changing Healthcare Providers, Self-prescribing, Covering Behaviors, Experiencing Health Complications, and Mistrusting Healthcare Institutions.

Discussion: By describing how patients react to experiences of unfair treatment and discrimination, our findings enhance the understanding of health disparities as patients cope and struggle to speak out.To combat these problems, we identify 3 future directions for informatics interventions that improve provider behavior, support patient advocacy, and address power dynamics in healthcare.

Conclusions: BIPOC and LGBTQ+ patients' perspectives on navigating unfair treatment and discrimination in healthcare offers critical insight into their experiences and long-term consequences of those experiences. Understanding the circumstances and consequences of unfair treatment, discrimination, and the impact of bias through this patient-centered lens is crucial to inform informatics technologies that promote health equity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667158PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unfair treatment
20
treatment discrimination
16
patients react
8
struggle speak
8
discrimination healthcare
8
experiences unfair
8
healthcare providers
8
long-term consequences
8
healthcare
7
discrimination
6

Similar Publications

Importance: Observational studies can provide valuable insights to inform decisions on health equity. Existing guidelines for reporting such studies, such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, currently lack specific considerations for reporting on health equity. Health equity is defined as the absence of avoidable and unfair differences that may exist across individuals and populations due to structural and systematic inequities in living and working conditions, opportunities, and resources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Even if a hiring process is merit-based and non-discriminatory, it may still fail to ensure substantive fairness if some applicants lacked a fair opportunity to develop their qualifications to compete. A familiar potential remedy for the problem is 'affirmative action', in the sense of preferential treatment for job candidates who lacked a fair opportunity to develop their job qualifications. I defend two analogous contentions about criminal justice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) was designed to increase patient safety, and anonymous reporting systems are often implemented to empower staff at all levels of an organization to speak up without the fear of reproach. However, the impact of these systems on patient outcomes remains largely unexamined. In this study, we survey physicians to assess whether they believe these mechanisms improve patient care or well-being.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Discrimination, or unfair treatment of individuals based on social group membership, is a major public health concern. To understand health inequities, it is critical to examine the physiological mechanisms-such as systemic inflammation-through which discrimination impacts health. However, estimations of the discrimination-inflammation association vary widely across studies, and it is unclear if the magnitude of the association varies as a function of methodological and sample characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perceived discrimination, patient-provider communication, and quality of life among breast cancer survivors: a mediation analysis.

J Cancer Surviv

August 2025

Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Suite 636, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Purpose: Breast cancer is common among women in the US and can impact survivors' quality of life (QoL). Perceived discrimination, defined as unfair treatment based on group membership, is often associated with poorer QoL, while effective patient-provider communication is often linked to better QoL. However, whether communication can mitigate the negative effects of discrimination remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF