Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Importance: Low-income older adults who are dually eligible (DE) for Medicare and Medicaid often experience worse outcomes following hospitalization. Among other federal policies aimed at improving health for DE patients, Medicare has recently begun reporting disparities in within-hospital readmissions. The degree to which disparities for DE patients are owing to differences in community-level factors or, conversely, are amenable to hospital quality improvement, remains heavily debated.

Objective: To examine the extent to which within-hospital disparities in 30-day readmission rates for DE patients are ameliorated by state- and community-level factors.

Design Setting And Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Disparity Methods were used to calculate within-hospital disparities in 30-day risk-adjusted readmission rates for DE vs non-DE patients in US hospitals participating in Medicare. All analyses were performed in February and March 2019. The study included Medicare patients (aged ≥65 years) hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia in 2014 to 2017.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Within-hospital disparities, as measured by the rate difference (RD) in 30-day readmission between DE vs non-DE patients following admission for AMI, HF, or pneumonia; variance across hospitals; and correlation of hospital RDs with and without adjustment for state Medicaid eligibility policies and community-level factors.

Results: The final sample included 475 444 patients admitted for AMI, 898 395 for HF, and 1 214 282 for pneumonia, of whom 13.2%, 17.4%, and 23.0% were DE patients, respectively. Dually eligible patients had higher 30-day readmission rates relative to non-DE patients (RD >0) in 99.0% (AMI), 99.4% (HF), and 97.5% (pneumonia) of US hospitals. Across hospitals, the mean (IQR) RD between DE vs non-DE was 1.00% (0.87%-1.10%) for AMI, 0.82% (0.73%-0.96%) for HF, and 0.53% (0.37%-0.71%) for pneumonia. The mean (IQR) RD after adjustment for community-level factors was 0.87% (0.73%-0.97%) for AMI, 0.67% (0.57%-0.80%) for HF, and 0.42% (0.29%-0.57%) for pneumonia. Relative hospital rankings of corresponding within-hospital disparities before and after community-level adjustment were highly correlated (Pearson coefficient, 0.98).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this cohort study, within-hospital disparities in 30-day readmission for DE patients were modestly associated with differences in state Medicaid policies and community-level factors. This suggests that remaining variation in these disparities should be the focus of hospital efforts to improve the quality of care transitions at discharge for DE patients in efforts to advance equity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903116PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4611DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

within-hospital disparities
20
readmission rates
16
30-day readmission
16
dually eligible
12
medicare medicaid
12
patients
12
community-level factors
12
disparities 30-day
12
non-de patients
12
disparities
9

Similar Publications

: The concept of learning organisations, which rely on research-based evidence and emphasise employees' continuous learning and professional development, is essential for effectively managing change and enhancing the quality of services. To better understand the effects of implementing learning organisation principles in hospital settings, this study aimed to compare the perceptions of selected health professionals regarding learning organisations across five sub-districts in South Africa's Eastern Cape province. : This study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design to collect data from selected health professionals in 9 hospitals in Eastern Cape province.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Despite improvements in access to stroke technology, it remains unclear whether Black and White patients with stroke experience similar benefits after a hospital becomes stroke certified and whether stroke center expansion has changed disparities between Black and White patients over time.

Objective: To examine the association of hospital stroke center certification with receipt of acute ischemic stroke treatments and health outcomes between Black and White patients with stroke.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study implemented a linear probability model with hospital fixed effects to evaluate changes in outcomes for Black and White patients, comparing outcomes before and after a hospital was certified as a stroke center (treatment group) relative to changes in outcomes at hospitals that did not acquire stroke certification (control group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Communities disproportionately burdened by adverse neighborhood-level social and structural factors may experience greater vulnerability to environmental exposures, contributing to health inequities, including adverse COVID-19. We assessed the effects of chronic air pollution on COVID-19 morbidities in NYC and examined whether these effects varied by neighborhood-level vulnerability.

Methods: We used NYC COVID-19 hospitalization records (3/1/2020-2/28/2021) and conducted analyses in the full sample and within hospital catchment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) are related to maternal, hospital, and residential factors, but the contribution of these factors to racial disparities in SMM within Medicaid and private insured groups is largely unknown. Linked Georgia vital records/hospital discharge data for 2016-2020 are used to identify SMM during delivery or within 42 days postpartum for Medicaid and private insured. The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition is used to describe the percentage of the Black-White SMM gap explained, based on linear probability models without and with hospital fixed-effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hospitals are motivated to create more autism friendly environments to optimise access and experience for the community. However, there is a lack of clarity in what the term autism friendly in hospital settings means. We conducted a scoping review of four online databases and eleven national autism organisations to determine existing definitions for autism friendly within hospital settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF