Multiarterial Phase Acquisition in Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI for the Detection of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients: Comparison of Compressed Sensing Versus View Sharing Techniques.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare compressed sensing (CS) and view sharing (VS) techniques for single breath-hold multiarterial phase imaging with respect to image quality and focal liver observation detectability during gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials And Methods: A total of 385 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, including triple arterial phases using either CS (n = 224) or VS (n = 161) techniques, were retrospectively included. Among them, 117 patients had 171 focal liver observations (median diameter, 1.3 cm), which were classified according to Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018. The acquisition rate of optimally timed late arterial phase (LAP) was assessed, and image quality, including respiratory motion artifact and observation conspicuity, was rated on a 4-point scale by 3 radiologists. The Mann-Whitney U test and nonparametric test for repeated measures data were used for image quality and observation conspicuity analysis. The jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics method was used to compare the observation detectability between the 2 techniques.

Results: The CS technique showed significantly higher acquisition rate of optimally timed LAP without transient severe motion (82.1% [184/224] vs 71.4% [115/161]; P = 0.013) than the VS technique. The CS technique also demonstrated significantly improved overall image quality (3.42 ± 0.70 vs 2.97 ± 0.61; P < 0.001) compared with the VS technique. Regarding the detection of hyperenhancing observations, there was no significant difference between the figure of merits of CS and VS techniques (0.660 vs 0.665; P = 0.890). However, the CS technique showed a higher detection rate in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System M (LR-M, probably or definitely malignant but not HCC specific) observations than the VS technique (100.0% [9/9] vs 44.4% [8/18]; P = 0.009).

Conclusion: The CS technique tended to provide optimally timed LAP without transient severe motion and demonstrated greater detection rate of LR-M observations than the VS technique in patients at high risk of HCC.