98%
921
2 minutes
20
Toothpastes and mouthwashes contain chemicals that may be harmful to oral tissues. This study assessed the cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of toothpastes and compare the Iranian and foreign toothpastes and mouthwashes available in the Iranian market in this respect. Twenty samples (13 toothpastes and 4 mouthwashes) were selected. The cytotoxicity of 1, 10, and 50 mg/mL of toothpastes and 0.05, 2 and 10 µL of mouthwashes was measured after 1, 15 and 30 min of exposure to human gingival fibroblasts, each in triplicate. The methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay was used for cytotoxicity testing. The serial dilution method was utilized to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each sample against () and (). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used for data analysis. A significant difference in cytotoxicity was noted among different products (P=0.00). The difference in cytotoxicity of each sample was not significant at 1, 15 and 30 min (P=0.08). The obtained MIC for all toothpastes and mouthwashes was between 0.0039 mg/mL and 0.0156 mg/mL, except for Sensodyne toothpaste and Oral B mouthwash. Some brands of toothpastes have higher cytotoxicity due to their composition, and their cytotoxicity should not be overlooked. The antibacterial activity of the samples was almost equal when they were in contact with and except for the Irsha mouthwash, Sehat, Darugar and Bath toothpastes. The antibacterial effect of toothpastes and mouthwashes increased with an increase in exposure time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355837 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i7.5650 | DOI Listing |
Odontology
September 2025
Department of Biology, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Streptococcus mutans, a key cause of dental caries, is not treated by conventional toothpaste, brushing, flossing, or antiseptic mouthwashes. This necessitates the development of enriched toothpaste. Cyanobacteria-derived phycoerythrin (PE) has antioxidant and antibacterial properties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
August 2025
University Hospital for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, Innsbruck, A- 6020, Austria.
Objectives: Fluoride application is crucial for caries prevention; yet guidelines for middle childhood remain limited. This study evaluated the daily fluoride exposure of children aged six to 12 years and compare the findings with the available recommendations.
Methods: Children applied their usual amount of toothpaste to a manual toothbrush, which was weighed before and after application.
J Dent
October 2025
Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Texas Tech Health Science Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Objectives: Previous studies has shown that hydroxyapatite (HAP) in oral care formulations could serve as a favorable fluoride alternative for caries management. The present study compared the efficacy of different hydroxyapatite-containing toothpastes in remineralizing early caries lesions.
Methods: Early enamel caries lesion were produced on one hundred and sixty bovine enamel blocks by 3-day demineralization using a multispies microbial caries model.
BMC Oral Health
July 2025
Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: Orthodontic patients are often instructed to use fluoride mouthrinses (FMR) to prevent caries during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances (FOA). The aim of this study was to examine the caries preventive effect of FMR during FOA treatment based on randomized controlled trials.
Methods: An information specialist searched five databases up to September 30, 2024.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
June 2025
Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of fluoride on the cytotoxicity of buccal mucosa cells in the presence of nickel-titanium archwires.
Materials And Methods: Seventy-five subjects requiring comprehensive orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated to three groups. Healthy control group included normal subjects who did not receive orthodontic treatment.